Search

Senator · 2018

The same election in senator 2018

BrazilState of Mato GrossoCity
2014
ElectionSenator 2018

Eleição in Mato Grosso

Year

The dashed year didn't have this election here: it opens the closest office, written below.

All elections34 anos in Mato Grosso, de 1933 a 2026

No result in Mato Grosso: in all of Brazil

G é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.

The same office appears twice in the year a place voted on a different date from the rest of the country (because of a postponement, for example).

2022

In 2018, Jayme Campos (DEM) won the Senate election for Mato Grosso, with 23.55% of the valid votes, according to data from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE).

Registered voters2,329,374
Turned out1,757,368
Abstentions572,006
Blank274,527
Null478,374
Valid2,083,293

Registered voters: voters who could vote. Turnout: how many went to the polls. Abstentions: how many stayed away (registered voters − turnout). Blank and Null: those who turned out but did not choose a valid candidate. Valid: the votes that count for candidates (turnout − blank − null); percentages are calculated on them.

3 seats in the Federal Senate: the whole chamber, adding up 1 elected in 2014 and 2 elected in 2018.

PSD: 1 cadeiraJayme Campos (DEM · 490.699 votos)PR: 1 cadeira

Hover over or tap a dot to see who holds the seat.

PSDPartido Social Democrático133.33%
PRPartido da República133.33%
DEMDemocratas133.33%
  1. Jayme Campos490,699

Elected seats, from the TSE results. This is the composition that came out of the ballot boxes, not the one the chamber had over the legislative term: anyone who switched parties after the election does not change this number. The count adds up those elected, without recalculating the quotient, so it matches the legal size of the chamber.

Votes by party (all, including those that elected no one)

Each party by its total votes (candidate votes + party-list votes), including those that won no seat.

PSDB1,029,291no seat
1,029,291 candidate votes
PSDPartido Social Democrático944,2091 seat
944,209 candidate votes
PRPartido da República646,3441 seat
646,344 candidate votes
DEMDemocratas490,6991 seat
490,699 candidate votes
PSOL345,934no seat
345,934 candidate votes
PRB333,082no seat
333,082 candidate votes
PATRIOTA293,362no seat
293,362 candidate votes
PC do B172,259no seat
172,259 candidate votes
PODE138,922no seat
138,922 candidate votes
PT117,933no seat
117,933 candidate votes
NOVO92,708no seat
92,708 candidate votes
SOLIDARIEDADE71,368no seat
71,368 candidate votes
DC66,966no seat
66,966 candidate votes
AVANTE58,455no seat
58,455 candidate votes
PSC36,545no seat
36,545 candidate votes
PPL9,325no seat
9,325 candidate votes
REDE8,900no seat
8,900 candidate votes
General Election2018SenatorMato Grosso (MT)

Click a candidate to see their candidacy history.

See on the map

One candidacy on this list had its votes annulled, according to data from the TSE: it appears at the end, with the votes entered on the voting machines (the machine tally report), without a percentage and outside the ranking of valid votes, because these votes are not part of the valid votes. The tag next to it shows the status of the candidacy registration in the TSE data, which may still change with a decision by the Electoral Courts.

See the result by city

In this election each federative unit chose TWO senators. The Federal Senate is not renewed all at once: every four years one third of the seats goes to a vote (one per state) and, four years later, two thirds (two per state). In two-seat years voters chose two different names, which is why the sum of the votes exceeds the number of voters who turned out: in 2010 there were 173,007,018 valid votes for 111,038,684 voters who turned out. It is not a counting error or a double count: a single voter could produce up to two valid votes. In one-seat years the ratio goes back to normal and valid votes fall below turnout, because blank and null votes and abstentions are left out of the count.