Search

Paulo Rocha

Photo of Paulo Roberto Galvão da Rocha
Paulo Rocha
Paulo Roberto Galvão da Rocha (legal name)
8 elections between 1990 and 2018 · PT
67 years old in 2018 · Male · Secondary education, complete
Senador
social media reported to the TSE

Paulo Rocha (Paulo Roberto Galvão da Rocha) ran in 8 elections between 1990 and 2018, for governor, senator and federal deputy, according to data from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). He was elected 6 times: senator in 2014; federal deputy in 2006, 2002, 1998, 1994 and 1990. The highest vote was in 2010, for senator for PA: 1,733,376 votes, annulled according to the TSE data. In the Federal Senate, had R$ 160 million committed in 88 individual amendments to the 2016 to 2023 budgets, to 166 municipalities; 93% has already been paid, counting carried-over payables. In the 2018 campaign for governor for PA, reported R$ 1.4 million in income: R$ 1.2 million from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 5 thousand from the Party Fund and R$ 210 thousand from private donations (23 donors and an online crowdfunding campaign). Contracted spending totals R$ 1.4 million, mainly on production of radio, television or video programs (R$ 715 thousand), advertising with printed materials (R$ 327 thousand) and fuel and lubricants (R$ 106 thousand). In previous campaigns, already closed, reported contracted spending of R$ 3.3 million in 2014 and R$ 1.8 million in 2010.

4 sectionsTap a section title to open or collapse it.

Vote trend across elections

652,923 votes in 2018 · 8 elections

The votes of Paulo Roberto Galvão da Rocha in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.

Federal Dep.SenatorGovernor

The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. "Annulled votes" = votes cast in the voting machines that, according to the TSE data, do not count among the valid votes (the registration status is in the list below). From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.

Campaign funding

2018: R$ 1.4 million in income · R$ 1.4 million em gastos contratados

Paulo Rocha reported income and spending to the TSE in 4 campaigns: federal deputy for Pará in 2006, senator for Pará in 2010 and 2014, and governor for Pará in 2018. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. In the most recent campaign, in 2018, reported R$ 1.4 million in income: R$ 1.2 million from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 5 thousand from the Party Fund and R$ 210 thousand from private donations (23 donors and an online crowdfunding campaign). Contracted spending totals R$ 1.4 million, mainly on production of radio, television or video programs (R$ 715 thousand) and advertising with printed materials (R$ 327 thousand). In 2014, R$ 3.3 million in committed spending; in 2010, 59% of the R$ 1.8 million in committed spending went to advertising with printed materials.

Income in 2018R$ 1.4 millioncampaign closed
Spending in 2018R$ 1.4 millioncontracted
Spending in 2014R$ 3.3 millioncontracted, campaign closed
Campaigns42006, 2010, 2014 and 2018

Fundraising, where the money came from:

  • Electoral Fund (FEFC)
  • Party Fund
  • Other resources from the party and other campaigns
  • Donations from individuals (includes crowdfunding)
  • Companies (until 2014)
  • Own funds
2018Governor, ParáSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 1.4 million
23 individual donors and an online crowdfunding campaign
FEFC 85% · Party Fund less than 1% · individuals 15%
Spending contracted
R$ 1.4 million
paid: R$ 1.4 million (99%)
  • Production of radio, television or video programsR$ 715 thousand49.3%
  • Printed materialsR$ 327 thousand22.6%
  • Fuel and lubricantsR$ 106 thousand7.3%
  • StaffR$ 41 thousand2.8%
  • 22 other categoriesincludes R$ 2 thousand entered as "miscellaneous, to be specified" and R$ 73 thousand donated to other candidates and partiesR$ 261 thousand18.0%
2014Senator, ParáSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 3.3 million
6 individual donors
party and other campaigns 86% · individuals less than 1% · companies 14%
Spending contracted
R$ 3.3 million
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
  • Production of radio, television or video programsR$ 913 thousand27.6%
  • Printed materialsR$ 784 thousand23.7%
  • Publicidade por placas, estandartes e faixasR$ 508 thousand15.4%
  • Fuel and lubricantsR$ 301 thousand9.1%
  • 15 other categoriesincludes R$ 63 thousand entered as "miscellaneous, to be specified" and R$ 350 thousand donated to other candidates and partiesR$ 796 thousand24.1%
2010Senator, ParáSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 1.7 million
3 individual donors
party and other campaigns 41% · individuals 12% · companies 47%
Spending contracted
R$ 1.8 million
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
  • Printed materialsR$ 1.1 million58.7%
  • Vehicle lending or rentalR$ 315 thousand17.3%
  • Fuel and lubricantsR$ 226 thousand12.4%
  • Property rentalR$ 40 thousand2.2%
  • 7 other categoriesincludes R$ 54 thousand entered as "miscellaneous, to be specified" and R$ 10 thousand donated to other candidates and partiesR$ 174 thousand9.5%
See the previous campaign
2006Federal deputy, ParáSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 594 thousand
9 individual donors
party 47% · individuals 1% · companies 49% · own funds 2%
Spending contracted
R$ 406 thousand
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
  • Printed materialsR$ 184 thousand45.4%
  • Locação/cessão de bens móveisR$ 66 thousand16.2%
  • Production of radio, television or video programsR$ 31 thousand7.6%
  • Fuel and lubricantsR$ 30 thousand7.4%
  • 13 other categoriesincludes R$ 6 thousand entered as "miscellaneous, to be specified"R$ 96 thousand23.5%

Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. 2018: TSE data of 13/09/2026. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.

See donors, suppliers and spending ›

Legislative amendments

R$ 160 million committed · 93% paid · 88 amendments in 166 municipalities

Federal Senate. For information only, based on public data1 · summary and analysis generated with AI2 · data updated on 10/14/20263

In the Federal Senate, Paulo Rocha had R$ 160 million committed (amount pledged by the government) in 88 individual amendments to the 2016 to 2023 budgets, to 166 municipalities. R$ 149.1 million (93%) has already been paid, counting carried-over payables. The area that received the most in the 2019 a 2022 legislative term was Saúde (51%). The cities that received the most in the 2019 a 2022 legislative term were Belém, Igarapé-Miri and Cametá. By legislative term: in the 2019 a 2022 legislative term, R$ 106.4 million in 53 amendments; in the 2015 a 2018 legislative term, R$ 53.7 million in 35 amendments.2

CommittedR$ 160 million2016 to 2023 budgets
PaidR$ 149.1 million93% of the committed amount, with carried-over payables
Amendments88individual
Municipalities166different
By budget year (legislative term 2019 a 2022)
BudgetCommittedPaid% paidAmendmentsMunicipalities
2023R$ 57.1 millionR$ 57.7 million101%1550
2022R$ 17.7 millionR$ 17.7 million99%1152
2021R$ 15.6 millionR$ 13.5 million87%118
2020R$ 14.6 millionR$ 12.6 million86%1533
Legislative term 2019 a 2022R$ 105 millionR$ 101.5 million97%52101

Areas that received the most (2019 a 2022)

  1. 1SaúdeR$ 54.5 million51.2%
  2. 2Encargos EspeciaisR$ 26 million24.4%
  3. 3EducaçãoR$ 13.8 million12.9%

Municipalities that received the most (2019 a 2022)

  1. 1BelémR$ 18.4 million17.3%
  2. 2Igarapé-MiriR$ 5.1 million4.8%
  3. 3CametáR$ 2.1 million2.0%

Source: Transparency Portal (CGU), organized by Radar do Voto, collected at the source in Oct 2026. Only individual amendments, including special transfers (the "Pix amendments"); the amount is the committed amount, and paid includes carried-over payables. Caucus, committee and rapporteur amendments, which do not have a single author, are in the dashboard.

See all amendments in the Amendments Radar ›

  1. 1

    Disclaimer. Information for reference only, organized by Radar do Voto from public data. It does not replace checking the original source: the Transparency Portal (CGU) and the Federal Senate website. Radar do Voto is not responsible for decisions made based only on this information. ↩

  2. 2

    Analysis generated with AI. The summary and analysis texts in this section were generated with the help of artificial intelligence from these data and may contain inaccuracies. When in doubt, the numbers from the original source prevail. ↩

  3. 3

    May be out of date. Committed and paid amounts change during the year, and this section may not reflect the most recent publication from the source. Data updated on 10/14/2026, collected at the source in Oct 2026. ↩

Candidacies

8 candidacies · elected in 2002, 2006 and 2014

This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.

G é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.

A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.

The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.