Search

Photo of Franciane Conceição Gago Motta

Franciane Motta

Franciane Conceição Gago Motta (legal name)
5 elections between 2004 and 2022 · latest party UNIÃO
51 years old in 2022 · Female · Secondary education, complete
Deputado
social media reported to the TSE

Franciane Motta (Franciane Conceição Gago Motta) ran in 5 elections between 2004 and 2022, for state deputy, mayor and deputy mayor, according to data from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). She was elected 5 times: state deputy in 2022 and 2018; mayor of Saquarema in 2012 and 2008; deputy mayor of Saquarema in 2004. The highest vote was in 2018, for state deputy for RJ: 45,123 votes. In the Legislative Assembly of Rio de Janeiro, directed R$ 8.8 million in 39 state amendments to the 2024 to 2026 budgets, to 17 municipalities; 42% of this amount has already been paid. In the 2022 campaign for state deputy for RJ, reported R$ 1.4 million in income: R$ 1.4 million from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 13 from the Party Fund, R$ 2 thousand de outras campanhas, R$ 2 thousand from private donations and R$ 30 thousand from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 1.4 million, mainly on third-party services (R$ 762 thousand), advertising with printed materials (R$ 271 thousand) and legal services (R$ 142 thousand). In previous campaigns, already closed, reported contracted spending of R$ 678 thousand in 2018 (41% on advertising with printed materials) and R$ 1.4 million in 2012.

State Deputy · 2022
37,873
votes · RJ
ELECTED
Term ends in 2026
4 sectionsTap a section title to open or collapse it.

Vote trend across elections

37,873 votes in 2022 (elected) · 5 elections

The votes of Franciane Conceição Gago Motta in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.

MayorState Dep.ticket votes (running mate/alternate)

The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. The hatched bar marks an executive running mate or an alternate senator: they do not receive individual votes, so the bar shows the ticket votes of the main candidate (hence the "ticket" next to the number). From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.

Campaign funding

2022: R$ 1.4 million in income · R$ 1.4 million em gastos

Franciane Motta reported income and spending to the TSE in 4 campaigns: mayor in Saquarema (RJ) in 2008 and 2012, and state deputy for Rio de Janeiro in 2018 and 2022. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. In the most recent campaign, in 2022, reported R$ 1.4 million in income: R$ 1.4 million from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 13 from the Party Fund, R$ 2 thousand de outras campanhas, R$ 2 thousand from private donations and R$ 30 thousand from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 1.4 million, mainly on third-party services (R$ 762 thousand) and advertising with printed materials (R$ 271 thousand). In 2018, 41% of the R$ 678 thousand in spending went to advertising with printed materials; in 2012, R$ 1.4 million in committed spending.

Income in 2022R$ 1.4 millioncampaign closed
Spending in 2022R$ 1.4 millioncampaign closed; all paid
Spending in 2018R$ 678 thousandcampaign closed; all paid
Campaigns42008, 2012, 2018 and 2022

Fundraising, where the money came from:

  • Electoral Fund (FEFC)
  • Party Fund
  • Other resources from the party and other campaigns
  • Donations from individuals (includes crowdfunding)
  • Companies (until 2014)
  • Own funds
2022State deputy, Rio de JaneiroSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 1.4 million
donations from individuals
FEFC 98% · Party Fund less than 1% · party and other campaigns less than 1% · individuals less than 1% · own funds 2%
Spending contracted
R$ 1.4 million
all paid (100%)
  • Third-party servicesR$ 762 thousand54.4%
  • Printed materialsR$ 271 thousand19.3%
  • Legal servicesR$ 142 thousand10.1%
  • Vehicle lending or rentalR$ 84 thousand6.0%
  • 9 other categoriesR$ 142 thousand10.1%
2018State deputy, Rio de JaneiroSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 699 thousand
no donations from individuals
FEFC 71% · Party Fund less than 1% · party and other campaigns 2% · own funds 26%
Spending contracted
R$ 678 thousand
all paid (100%)
  • Printed materialsR$ 280 thousand41.3%
  • Third-party servicesR$ 249 thousand36.7%
  • Advertising with stickersR$ 98 thousand14.4%
  • Property rentalR$ 15 thousand2.2%
  • 10 other categoriesincludes R$ 800 entered as "miscellaneous, to be specified"R$ 37 thousand5.4%
2012Mayor, Saquarema (RJ)See donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 1.7 million
5 individual donors
party 66% · individuals 2% · companies 32%
Spending contracted
R$ 1.4 million
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
  • Publicidade por placas, estandartes e faixasR$ 537 thousand39.8%
  • Fuel and lubricantsR$ 323 thousand23.9%
  • Printed materialsR$ 87 thousand6.5%
  • Creation and inclusion of web pagesR$ 86 thousand6.4%
  • 12 other categoriesincludes R$ 48 thousand entered as "miscellaneous, to be specified" and R$ 40 thousand donated to other candidates and partiesR$ 317 thousand23.5%
See the previous campaign
2008Mayor, Saquarema (RJ)See donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 724 thousand
49 individual donors
party and other campaigns 45% · individuals 24% · companies 30%
Spending contracted
R$ 724 thousand
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
  • Fuel and lubricantsR$ 292 thousand40.3%
  • Printed materialsR$ 101 thousand13.9%
  • Advertising with sound carsR$ 57 thousand7.8%
  • RalliesR$ 48 thousand6.6%
  • 15 other categoriesincludes R$ 1 thousand entered as "miscellaneous, to be specified"R$ 227 thousand31.3%

Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. 2022: TSE data of 13/09/2026; 2018: TSE data of 13/09/2026. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.

See donors, suppliers and spending ›

Legislative amendments

R$ 8.8 million directed · 42% paid · 39 amendments in 17 municipalities

Legislative Assembly of Rio de Janeiro. For information only, based on public data1 · summary and analysis generated with AI2 · may be out of date3 · approximate state figures4

In the Legislative Assembly of Rio de Janeiro, Franciane Motta directed R$ 8.8 million in 39 state amendments to the 2024 to 2026 budgets (legislative term 2023 a 2026), to 17 municipalities. As of the data collection at the source, 42% of this amount had been paid. The agency that received the most was Fes (63%). The cities that received the most were Itaguaí, São Fidélis and Araruama.2

SponsoredR$ 8.8 million2024 to 2026 budgets
PaidR$ 3.7 million42% of the amount directed
Amendments39state
Municipalities17different
By budget year
BudgetSponsoredPaid% paidAmendmentsMunicipalities
2026R$ 3.2 millionR$ 823 thousand26%1912
2025R$ 2.9 millionR$ 2.9 million100%84
2024R$ 2.7 millionR$ 00%126
TotalR$ 8.8 millionR$ 3.7 million42%3917

Agencies that received the most

  1. 1FesR$ 5.5 million62.9%
  2. 2SeeducR$ 3 million33.8%
  3. 3SegovR$ 290 thousand3.3%

Municipalities that received the most

  1. 1ItaguaíR$ 1.6 million18.6%
  2. 2São FidélisR$ 1.3 million14.6%
  3. 3AraruamaR$ 1.1 million12.5%

Source: ALERJ / SEPLAG-RJ — Emendas parlamentares impositivas (bases de detalhe 2024-2026 + execução), organized by Radar do Voto. The total leaves out blocked amendments and caucus, committee and rapporteur amendments, which do not have a single author. "Paid" is the current stage of each amendment at the source.

See all amendments in the Amendments Radar ›

  1. 1

    Disclaimer. Information for reference only, organized by Radar do Voto from public data. It does not replace checking the original source: the transparency portal of the Rio de Janeiro state government and the Legislative Assembly of Rio de Janeiro. Radar do Voto is not responsible for decisions made based only on this information. ↩

  2. 2

    Analysis generated with AI. The summary and analysis texts in this section were generated with the help of artificial intelligence from these data and may contain inaccuracies. When in doubt, the numbers from the original source prevail. ↩

  3. 3

    May be out of date. Committed and paid amounts change during the year, and this section may not reflect the most recent publication from the source. ↩

  4. 4

    About the state data. Each state publishes legislative amendments in its own format, with different levels of detail and publication deadlines. That is why there may be amendments without an identified municipality, amounts reallocated to another purpose and payments that only appear at the source some time later. The state figures in this profile are an approximation: before any formal use, check the transparency portal of the Rio de Janeiro state government and the Legislative Assembly of Rio de Janeiro. ↩

Candidacies

5 candidacies · elected in 2012, 2018 and 2022

This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.

G é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.

A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.

The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.