Sérgio Zveiter ran in 7 elections between 2000 and 2022, for alternate senator, federal deputy and mayor, according to data from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). He was elected 2 times: federal deputy in 2014 and 2010. The highest vote was in 2000, for mayor in Niterói/RJ: 121,741 votes. In the Chamber of Deputies, had R$ 25.5 million committed in 10 individual amendments to the 2018 to 2019 budgets, to 7 municipalities; 95% has already been paid, counting carried-over payables. In the 2014 campaign for federal deputy for RJ, reported R$ 5.7 million in income: R$ 967 thousand de outros recursos do partido e de outras campanhas, R$ 527 thousand from private donations, R$ 475 thousand from companies and R$ 3.8 million from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 5.7 million, mainly on publicidade por placas, estandartes e faixas (R$ 524 thousand), advertising with printed materials (R$ 435 thousand) and third-party services (R$ 197 thousand). In previous campaigns, already closed, reported contracted spending of R$ 3.6 million in 2012 (47% on production of radio, television or video programs) and R$ 914 thousand in 2010.
4 sectionsTap a section title to open or collapse it.
1
Vote trend across elections
57,587 votes in 2014 (elected) · 7 elections
The votes of Sergio Zveiter in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.
The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. The hatched bar marks an executive running mate or an alternate senator: they do not receive individual votes, so the bar shows the ticket votes of the main candidate (hence the "ticket" next to the number). From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.
2
Campaign funding
2014: R$ 5.7 million in income · R$ 5.7 million em gastos contratados
Sérgio Zveiter reported income and spending to the TSE in 3 campaigns: federal deputy for Rio de Janeiro in 2010 and 2014, and mayor in Niterói (RJ) in 2012. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. In the most recent campaign, in 2014, reported R$ 5.7 million in income: R$ 967 thousand de outros recursos do partido e de outras campanhas, R$ 527 thousand from private donations, R$ 475 thousand from companies and R$ 3.8 million from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 5.7 million, mainly on publicidade por placas, estandartes e faixas (R$ 524 thousand) and advertising with printed materials (R$ 435 thousand). In 2012, 47% of the R$ 3.6 million in committed spending went to production of radio, television or video programs; in 2010, R$ 914 thousand in committed spending.
Income in 2014R$ 5.7 millioncampaign closed
Spending in 2014R$ 5.7 millioncontracted
Spending in 2012R$ 3.6 millioncontracted, campaign closed
Campaigns32010, 2012 and 2014
Fundraising, where the money came from:
Other resources from the party and other campaigns
Donations from individuals (includes crowdfunding)
party and other campaigns 64% · individuals 11% · companies 19% · own funds 5%
Spending contracted
R$ 914 thousand
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
Third-party servicesR$ 219 thousand23.9%
Advertising in newspapers and magazinesR$ 187 thousand20.5%
Printed materialsR$ 136 thousand14.9%
Vehicle lending or rentalR$ 110 thousand12.0%
11 other categoriesincludes R$ 8 thousand donated to other candidates and partiesR$ 262 thousand28.7%
Running mates and alternates do not have their own campaign account: the account is that of the main candidate's ticket.
Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.
R$ 25.5 million committed · 95% paid · 10 amendments in 7 municipalities
Chamber of Deputies. For information only, based on public data1 · summary and analysis generated with AI2 · data updated on 10/14/20263
In the Chamber of Deputies, Sérgio Zveiter had R$ 25.5 million committed (amount pledged by the government) in 10 individual amendments to the 2018 to 2019 budgets (legislative term 2015 a 2018), to 7 municipalities. R$ 24.2 million (95%) has already been paid, counting carried-over payables. The area that received the most was Saúde (78%). The cities that received the most were Nova Friburgo, Rio de Janeiro and Miracema.2
CommittedR$ 25.5 million2018 to 2019 budgets
PaidR$ 24.2 million95% of the committed amount, with carried-over payables
Amendments10individual
Municipalities7different
By budget year
Budget
Committed
Paid
% paid
Amendments
Municipalities
2019
R$ 12.8 million
R$ 12.8 million
100%
5
0
2018
R$ 12.7 million
R$ 11.2 million
88%
5
7
Total
R$ 25.6 million
R$ 24.1 million
94%
10
7
Areas that received the most
1SaúdeR$ 20 million78.3%
2UrbanismoR$ 1.5 million5.9%
3Desporto e LazerR$ 1.4 million5.6%
Municipalities that received the most
1Nova FriburgoR$ 1.5 million5.8%
2Rio de JaneiroR$ 1.3 million5.0%
3MiracemaR$ 1.2 million4.6%
Source: Transparency Portal (CGU), organized by Radar do Voto, collected at the source in Oct 2026. Only individual amendments, including special transfers (the "Pix amendments"); the amount is the committed amount, and paid includes carried-over payables. Caucus, committee and rapporteur amendments, which do not have a single author, are in the dashboard.
Disclaimer. Information for reference only, organized by Radar do Voto from public data. It does not replace checking the original source: the Transparency Portal (CGU) and the Chamber of Deputies website. Radar do Voto is not responsible for decisions made based only on this information. ↩
2
Analysis generated with AI. The summary and analysis texts in this section were generated with the help of artificial intelligence from these data and may contain inaccuracies. When in doubt, the numbers from the original source prevail. ↩
3
May be out of date. Committed and paid amounts change during the year, and this section may not reflect the most recent publication from the source. Data updated on 10/14/2026, collected at the source in Oct 2026. ↩
4
Candidacies
7 candidacies · elected in 2010 and 2014
This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.
Alternate Senator · 2022NOT ELECTED986,676GRJ · 66 years · White · Higher education, complete · Advogado · PV · no. 133 · an alternate senator does not receive individual votes · see full result
Alternate Senator · 2018NOT ELECTED2,327,634GRJ · 62 years · White · Higher education, complete · Deputado · DEM · no. 255 · an alternate senator does not receive individual votes · see full result
Mayor · 2004—LNiterói, Rio de Janeiro · 48 years · Higher education, complete · Advogado · PL · no. 22 · registration was listed as withdrawn in the TSE data · see the election
Mayor · 2000First roundTO THE RUNOFF88,707LNiterói, Rio de Janeiro · 44 years · Higher education, complete · Advogado · PMDB · no. 15 · see full result
G é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.
A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.
The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.
