Já tem conta? Entrar
Ailton Miranda (Ailton Miranda Lustosa) ran in 5 elections between 2006 and 2022, for district deputy, according to data from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). Not listed as elected in any of them in the TSE results. The highest vote was in 2018, for district deputy for DF: 3,736 votes. In the 2022 campaign for district deputy for DF, reported R$ 36 thousand in income: R$ 30 thousand from the Electoral Fund (FEFC) and R$ 6 thousand from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 33 thousand, mainly on third-party services (R$ 10 thousand), advertising with printed materials (R$ 8 thousand) and activists and street mobilization (R$ 7 thousand). In previous campaigns, already closed, reported contracted spending of R$ 12 thousand in 2018 (99% on advertising with printed materials) and R$ 59 thousand in 2014.
See donors, suppliers and detailed spending of the campaign ›
The votes of Ailton Miranda Lustosa in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.
The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.
Ailton Miranda reported income and spending to the TSE in 5 campaigns: district deputy for Distrito Federal in 2006, 2010, 2014, 2018 and 2022. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. In the most recent campaign, in 2022, reported R$ 36 thousand in income: R$ 30 thousand from the Electoral Fund (FEFC) and R$ 6 thousand from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 33 thousand, mainly on third-party services (R$ 10 thousand) and advertising with printed materials (R$ 8 thousand). In 2018, 99% of the R$ 12 thousand in spending went to advertising with printed materials; in 2014, 42% of the R$ 59 thousand in committed spending went to activists and street mobilization.
Fundraising, where the money came from:
Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. 2022: TSE data of 13/09/2026; 2018: TSE data of 13/09/2026. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.
This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.
District Deputy · 20223,101not electedGDF · 53 years · Pardo (mixed race) · Secondary education, complete · Policial Militar · PTB · no. 14190 · see full resultcampaign finance report
District Deputy · 2018ALTERNATE3,736GDF · 49 years · White · Secondary education, complete · Policial Militar · PTC · no. 36111 · see full result
District Deputy · 2014ALTERNATE3,101GDF · 45 years · White · Secondary education, complete · Policial Militar · PPL · no. 54233 · see full result
District Deputy · 2010ALTERNATE2,206GDF · 41 years · Secondary education, complete · Policial Militar · PTB · no. 14111 · see full resultG é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.
A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.
The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.
