Josué Ramos (Josué Silveira Ramos) ran in 5 elections between 2008 and 2020, for mayor and federal deputy, according to data from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). He was elected 2 times: mayor of Vargem Grande Paulista in 2020 and 2016. The highest vote was in 2020, for mayor in Vargem Grande Paulista/SP: 14,741 votes. In the 2020 campaign for mayor in Vargem Grande Paulista/SP, reported R$ 263 thousand in income: R$ 240 thousand from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 11 thousand from private donations (6 donors) and R$ 12 thousand from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 246 thousand, mainly on advertising with printed materials (R$ 76 thousand), staff (R$ 43 thousand) and legal services (R$ 35 thousand). In previous campaigns, already closed, reported contracted spending of R$ 143 thousand in 2016 and R$ 282 thousand in 2014.
3 sectionsTap a section title to open or collapse it.
1
Vote trend across elections
14,741 votes in 2020 (elected) · 5 elections
The votes of Josue Silveira Ramos in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.
The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.
2
Campaign funding
2020: R$ 263 thousand in income · R$ 246 thousand em gastos
Josué Ramos reported income and spending to the TSE in 5 campaigns: mayor in Vargem Grande Paulista (SP) in 2008, 2012, 2016 and 2020, and federal deputy for São Paulo in 2014. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. In the most recent campaign, in 2020, reported R$ 263 thousand in income: R$ 240 thousand from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 11 thousand from private donations (6 donors) and R$ 12 thousand from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 246 thousand, mainly on advertising with printed materials (R$ 76 thousand) and staff (R$ 43 thousand). In 2016, R$ 143 thousand in committed spending; in 2014, R$ 282 thousand in committed spending.
Income in 2020R$ 263 thousandcampaign closed
Spending in 2020R$ 246 thousandcampaign closed; all paid
Spending in 2016R$ 143 thousandcontracted, campaign closed
Campaigns5from 2008 to 2020
Fundraising, where the money came from:
Electoral Fund (FEFC)
Party Fund
Other resources from the party and other campaigns
Donations from individuals (includes crowdfunding)
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
StaffR$ 2 thousand24.1%
Publicidade por placas, estandartes e faixasR$ 2 thousand24.1%
Printed materialsR$ 2 thousand21.2%
Advertising in newspapers and magazinesR$ 1 thousand13.2%
4 other categoriesR$ 1 thousand17.5%
Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. 2020: TSE data of 12/09/2026. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.
G é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.
A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.
The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.