Já tem conta? Entrar
Serginho (Serginho Rodrigues de Oliveira) ran in 2 elections between 2012 and 2016, for mayor and deputy mayor, according to data from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). He was elected 2 times: mayor of Bom Jardim da Serra in 2016; deputy mayor of Bom Jardim da Serra in 2012. In the 2016 campaign for mayor in Bom Jardim da Serra/SC, reported R$ 29 thousand in income: R$ 10 thousand from private donations (5 donors) and R$ 19 thousand from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 29 thousand, mainly on fuel and lubricants (R$ 12 thousand), serviços próprios prestados por terceiros (R$ 7 thousand) and advertising with printed materials (R$ 5 thousand).
See donors, suppliers and detailed spending of the campaign ›
The votes of Serginho Rodrigues de Oliveira in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.
The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. The hatched bar marks an executive running mate or an alternate senator: they do not receive individual votes, so the bar shows the ticket votes of the main candidate (hence the "ticket" next to the number). From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.
Serginho reported income and spending to the TSE in 2 campaigns: mayor in Bom Jardim da Serra (SC) in 2016 and 2016. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. In the most recent campaign, in 2016, reported R$ 29 thousand in income: R$ 10 thousand from private donations (5 donors) and R$ 19 thousand from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 29 thousand, mainly on fuel and lubricants (R$ 12 thousand) and serviços próprios prestados por terceiros (R$ 7 thousand). In 2016, 49% of the R$ 20 thousand in committed spending went to advertising with printed materials.
Fundraising, where the money came from:
Running mates and alternates do not have their own campaign account: the account is that of the main candidate's ticket.
Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.
This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.
Mayor · 2016First roundELECTED1,613LBom Jardim da Serra, Santa Catarina · 53 years · White · Primary education, complete · Agricultor · PTB · no. 14 · see full resultMayor · 2016—LBom Jardim da Serra, Santa Catarina · 53 years · White · Primary education, incomplete · Agricultor · PTB · no. 14 · registration was listed as rejected, under appeal in the TSE data · see the election
Deputy Mayor · 2012ELECTED2,013LBom Jardim da Serra, Santa Catarina · 49 years · Primary education, incomplete · Agricultor · PSDB · no. 45 · a running mate does not receive individual votes · see full resultG é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.
A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.
The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.
