Search

Lelo Coimbra

Photo of Welington Coimbra
Lelo Coimbra
Welington Coimbra (legal name)
9 elections between 1990 and 2018 · latest party MDB
64 years old in 2018 · Male · Higher education, complete
Deputado
social media reported to the TSE

Lelo Coimbra (Welington Coimbra) ran in 9 elections between 1990 and 2018, for federal deputy, mayor, vice governor and state deputy, according to data from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). He was elected 5 times: federal deputy in 2014, 2010 and 2006; vice governor in 2002; state deputy in 1994. The highest vote was in 2006, for federal deputy for ES: 120,821 votes. In the Chamber of Deputies, had R$ 48.2 million committed in 42 individual amendments to the 2016 to 2019 budgets, to 41 municipalities; 84% has already been paid, counting carried-over payables. In the 2018 campaign for federal deputy for ES, reported R$ 2.4 million in income: R$ 2.4 million from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 1 thousand de outras campanhas and R$ 950 from private donations (an online crowdfunding campaign). Contracted spending totals R$ 2.3 million, mainly on activists and street mobilization (R$ 871 thousand), advertising with printed materials (R$ 702 thousand) and third-party services (R$ 260 thousand). In previous campaigns, already closed, reported contracted spending of R$ 719 thousand in 2016 and R$ 2.2 million in 2014.

4 sectionsTap a section title to open or collapse it.

Vote trend across elections

52,765 votes in 2018 · 9 elections

The votes of Welington Coimbra in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.

State Dep.GovernorFederal Dep.Mayorticket votes (running mate/alternate)

The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. The hatched bar marks an executive running mate or an alternate senator: they do not receive individual votes, so the bar shows the ticket votes of the main candidate (hence the "ticket" next to the number). From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.

Campaign funding

2018: R$ 2.4 million in income · R$ 2.3 million em gastos

Lelo Coimbra reported income and spending to the TSE in 5 campaigns: federal deputy for Espírito Santo in 2006, 2010, 2014 and 2018, and mayor in Vitória (ES) in 2016. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. In the most recent campaign, in 2018, reported R$ 2.4 million in income: R$ 2.4 million from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 1 thousand de outras campanhas and R$ 950 from private donations (an online crowdfunding campaign). Contracted spending totals R$ 2.3 million, mainly on activists and street mobilization (R$ 871 thousand) and advertising with printed materials (R$ 702 thousand). In 2016, R$ 719 thousand in committed spending; in 2014, R$ 2.2 million in committed spending.

Income in 2018R$ 2.4 millioncampaign closed
Spending in 2018R$ 2.3 millioncampaign closed; all paid
Spending in 2016R$ 719 thousandcontracted, campaign closed
Campaigns5from 2006 to 2018

Fundraising, where the money came from:

  • Electoral Fund (FEFC)
  • Party Fund
  • Other resources from the party and other campaigns
  • Donations from individuals (includes crowdfunding)
  • Companies (until 2014)
  • Own funds
2018Federal deputy, Espírito SantoSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 2.4 million
donations from individuals and an online crowdfunding campaign
FEFC 99% · party and other campaigns less than 1% · individuals less than 1%
Spending contracted
R$ 2.3 million
all paid (100%)
  • Activists and street mobilizationR$ 871 thousand37.7%
  • Printed materialsR$ 702 thousand30.4%
  • Third-party servicesR$ 260 thousand11.3%
  • Advertising with stickersR$ 187 thousand8.1%
  • 12 other categoriesincludes R$ 86 thousand donated to other candidates and partiesR$ 292 thousand12.6%
2016Mayor, Vitória (ES)See donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 743 thousand
89 individual donors
Party Fund 84% · individuals 16%
Spending contracted
R$ 719 thousand
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
  • Production of radio, television or video programsR$ 200 thousand27.8%
  • Printed materialsR$ 103 thousand14.3%
  • Third-party servicesR$ 71 thousand9.9%
  • Activists and street mobilizationR$ 67 thousand9.3%
  • 9 other categoriesR$ 278 thousand38.7%
2014Federal deputy, Espírito SantoSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 2.2 million
13 individual donors
party and other campaigns 47% · individuals 3% · companies 50%
Spending contracted
R$ 2.2 million
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
  • Activists and street mobilizationR$ 672 thousand30.1%
  • Third-party servicesR$ 437 thousand19.6%
  • Publicidade por placas, estandartes e faixasR$ 411 thousand18.4%
  • Printed materialsR$ 303 thousand13.6%
  • 14 other categoriesincludes R$ 85 thousand donated to other candidates and partiesR$ 411 thousand18.4%
See the 2 previous campaigns
2010Federal deputy, Espírito SantoSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 1.2 million
3 individual donors
party and other campaigns 44% · individuals 5% · companies 51%
Spending contracted
R$ 1.2 million
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
  • Printed materialsR$ 329 thousand26.8%
  • Publicidade por placas, estandartes e faixasR$ 234 thousand19.1%
  • Advertising with sound carsR$ 118 thousand9.6%
  • StaffR$ 91 thousand7.4%
  • 18 other categoriesR$ 455 thousand37.1%
2006Federal deputy, Espírito SantoSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 859 thousand
3 individual donors
individuals 2% · companies 95% · own funds 3%
Spending contracted
R$ 859 thousand
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
  • Printed materialsR$ 283 thousand32.9%
  • Publicidade por placas, estandartes e faixasR$ 231 thousand26.9%
  • Production of radio, television or video programsR$ 53 thousand6.2%
  • Advertising with sound carsR$ 47 thousand5.5%
  • 18 other categoriesincludes R$ 1 thousand entered as "miscellaneous, to be specified"R$ 245 thousand28.5%

Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. 2018: TSE data of 13/09/2026. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.

See donors, suppliers and spending ›

Legislative amendments

R$ 48.2 million committed · 84% paid · 42 amendments in 41 municipalities

Chamber of Deputies. For information only, based on public data1 · summary and analysis generated with AI2 · data updated on 10/14/20263

In the Chamber of Deputies, Lelo Coimbra had R$ 48.2 million committed (amount pledged by the government) in 42 individual amendments to the 2016 to 2019 budgets (legislative term 2015 a 2018), to 41 municipalities. R$ 40.6 million (84%) has already been paid, counting carried-over payables. The area that received the most was Saúde (54%). The cities that received the most were Vitória, Jerônimo Monteiro and Mantenópolis.2

CommittedR$ 48.2 million2016 to 2019 budgets
PaidR$ 40.6 million84% of the committed amount, with carried-over payables
Amendments42individual
Municipalities41different
By budget year
BudgetCommittedPaid% paidAmendmentsMunicipalities
2019R$ 14.5 millionR$ 12.9 million89%65
2018R$ 13.1 millionR$ 9.8 million75%1319
2017R$ 10.8 millionR$ 8.5 million78%1120
2016R$ 9.5 millionR$ 8.9 million95%1018
TotalR$ 47.8 millionR$ 40.1 million84%4041

Areas that received the most

  1. 1SaúdeR$ 26.2 million54.3%
  2. 2AgriculturaR$ 7.6 million15.8%
  3. 3UrbanismoR$ 5.8 million12.1%

Municipalities that received the most

  1. 1VitóriaR$ 3.1 million6.4%
  2. 2Jerônimo MonteiroR$ 3 million6.1%
  3. 3MantenópolisR$ 1.9 million3.8%

Source: Transparency Portal (CGU), organized by Radar do Voto, collected at the source in Oct 2026. Only individual amendments, including special transfers (the "Pix amendments"); the amount is the committed amount, and paid includes carried-over payables. Caucus, committee and rapporteur amendments, which do not have a single author, are in the dashboard.

See all amendments in the Amendments Radar ›

  1. 1

    Disclaimer. Information for reference only, organized by Radar do Voto from public data. It does not replace checking the original source: the Transparency Portal (CGU) and the Chamber of Deputies website. Radar do Voto is not responsible for decisions made based only on this information. ↩

  2. 2

    Analysis generated with AI. The summary and analysis texts in this section were generated with the help of artificial intelligence from these data and may contain inaccuracies. When in doubt, the numbers from the original source prevail. ↩

  3. 3

    May be out of date. Committed and paid amounts change during the year, and this section may not reflect the most recent publication from the source. Data updated on 10/14/2026, collected at the source in Oct 2026. ↩

Candidacies

9 candidacies · elected in 2006, 2010 and 2014

This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.

G é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.

A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.

The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.