Já tem conta? Entrar
Voss (Luiz Antonio Voss Campos) ran in 9 elections between 1994 and 2020, for city councillor, deputy mayor, state deputy and mayor, according to data from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). He was elected 2 times: deputy mayor of Tatuí in 2008; city councillor of Tatuí in 2004. The highest vote was in 2006, for state deputy for SP: 18,971 votes. In the 2020 campaign for city councillor in Tatuí/SP, reported R$ 7 thousand in income, from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 6 thousand, mainly on staff (R$ 3 thousand), vehicle lending or rental (R$ 900) and fuel and lubricants (R$ 850). In previous campaigns, already closed, reported contracted spending of R$ 8 thousand in 2016 (41% on staff) and R$ 129 thousand in 2006.
See donors, suppliers and detailed spending of the campaign ›
The votes of Luiz Antonio Voss Campos in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.
The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. The hatched bar marks an executive running mate or an alternate senator: they do not receive individual votes, so the bar shows the ticket votes of the main candidate (hence the "ticket" next to the number). From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.
Voss reported income and spending to the TSE in 3 campaigns: state deputy for São Paulo in 2006, and city councillor in Tatuí (SP) in 2016 and 2020. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. In the most recent campaign, in 2020, reported R$ 7 thousand in income, from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 6 thousand, mainly on staff (R$ 3 thousand) and vehicle lending or rental (R$ 900). In 2016, 41% of the R$ 8 thousand in committed spending went to staff; in 2006, R$ 129 thousand in committed spending.
Fundraising, where the money came from:
Running mates and alternates do not have their own campaign account: the account is that of the main candidate's ticket.
Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. 2020: TSE data of 12/09/2026. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.
This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.
City Councillor · 2020ALTERNATE539LTatuí, São Paulo · 68 years · White · Higher education, complete · Servidor Público Federal · PSDB · no. 45245 · see full resultcampaign finance report
City Councillor · 2016ALTERNATE612LTatuí, São Paulo · 64 years · White · Higher education, complete · Servidor Público Federal · PSDB · no. 45145 · see full result
Deputy Mayor · 2012NOT ELECTED24,786LTatuí, São Paulo · 60 years · Higher education, complete · Servidor Público Federal · PSDB · no. 45 · a running mate does not receive individual votes · see full resultG é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.
A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.
The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.
