Já tem conta? Entrar
Gica Baldissera (Gilmar Baldissera) ran in 6 elections between 1996 and 2024, for deputy mayor, city councillor and mayor, according to data from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). He was elected 3 times: city councillor of São Miguel do Oeste in 2020; deputy mayor of São Miguel do Oeste in 2016; mayor of São Miguel do Oeste in 1996. The highest vote was in 2000, for mayor in São Miguel do Oeste/SC: 7,332 votes. In the 2020 campaign for city councillor in São Miguel do Oeste/SC, reported R$ 9 thousand in income: R$ 6 thousand from private donations (5 donors) and R$ 3 thousand from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 9 thousand, mainly on advertising in newspapers and magazines (R$ 5 thousand), advertising with printed materials (R$ 2 thousand) and accounting services (R$ 500).
See donors, suppliers and detailed spending of the campaign ›
The votes of Gilmar Baldissera in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.
The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. The hatched bar marks an executive running mate or an alternate senator: they do not receive individual votes, so the bar shows the ticket votes of the main candidate (hence the "ticket" next to the number). From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.
Gica Baldissera reported income and spending to the TSE in 1 campaign: city councillor in São Miguel do Oeste (SC) in 2020. In the most recent campaign, in 2020, reported R$ 9 thousand in income: R$ 6 thousand from private donations (5 donors) and R$ 3 thousand from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 9 thousand, mainly on advertising in newspapers and magazines (R$ 5 thousand) and advertising with printed materials (R$ 2 thousand).
Fundraising, where the money came from:
Running mates and alternates do not have their own campaign account: the account is that of the main candidate's ticket.
Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. 2020: TSE data of 12/09/2026. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.
This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.
Deputy Mayor · 2024NOT ELECTED6,896LSão Miguel do Oeste, Santa Catarina · 64 years · White · Higher education, complete · Vereador · PP · no. 44 · a running mate does not receive individual votes · see full result
City Councillor · 2020ELECTED643LSão Miguel do Oeste, Santa Catarina · 60 years · White · Higher education, complete · Médico · PP · no. 11888 · see full resultcampaign finance report
Deputy Mayor · 2016ELECTED6,887LSão Miguel do Oeste, Santa Catarina · 56 years · White · Higher education, complete · Empresário · PP · no. 55 · registration was listed as withdrawn in the TSE data · see full resultG é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.
A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.
The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.
