Jacqueline Vieira (Jacqueline Vieira da Silva) ran in 5 elections between 2004 and 2018, for state deputy, deputy mayor and city councillor, according to data from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). Not listed as elected in any of them in the TSE results. The highest vote was in 2018, for state deputy for GO: 5,272 votes. In the 2018 campaign for state deputy for GO, reported R$ 484 thousand in income: R$ 244 thousand from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 186 thousand from the Party Fund, R$ 4 thousand de outras campanhas, R$ 43 thousand from private donations (24 donors) and R$ 7 thousand from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 453 thousand, mainly on staff (R$ 304 thousand), advertising with printed materials (R$ 42 thousand) and fuel and lubricants (R$ 40 thousand). In previous campaigns, already closed, reported contracted spending of R$ 2 thousand in 2010 and R$ 72 thousand in 2006.
3 sectionsTap a section title to open or collapse it.
1
Vote trend across elections
5,272 votes in 2018 · 5 elections
The votes of Jacqueline Vieira da Silva in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.
City CouncillorState Dep.Mayorticket votes (running mate/alternate)
The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. "Annulled votes" = votes cast in the voting machines that, according to the TSE data, do not count among the valid votes (the registration status is in the list below). The hatched bar marks an executive running mate or an alternate senator: they do not receive individual votes, so the bar shows the ticket votes of the main candidate (hence the "ticket" next to the number). From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.
2
Campaign funding
2018: R$ 484 thousand in income · R$ 453 thousand em gastos
Jacqueline Vieira reported income and spending to the TSE in 3 campaigns: state deputy for Goiás in 2006, 2010 and 2018. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. In the most recent campaign, in 2018, reported R$ 484 thousand in income: R$ 244 thousand from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 186 thousand from the Party Fund, R$ 4 thousand de outras campanhas, R$ 43 thousand from private donations (24 donors) and R$ 7 thousand from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 453 thousand, mainly on staff (R$ 304 thousand) and advertising with printed materials (R$ 42 thousand). In 2010, R$ 2 thousand in committed spending; in 2006, R$ 72 thousand in committed spending.
Income in 2018R$ 484 thousandcampaign closed
Spending in 2018R$ 453 thousandcampaign closed; all paid
Spending in 2010R$ 2 thousandcontracted, campaign closed
Campaigns32006, 2010 and 2018
Fundraising, where the money came from:
Electoral Fund (FEFC)
Party Fund
Other resources from the party and other campaigns
Donations from individuals (includes crowdfunding)
FEFC 50% · Party Fund 38% · party and other campaigns less than 1% · individuals 9% · own funds 1%
Spending contracted
R$ 453 thousand
all paid (100%)
StaffR$ 304 thousand67.1%
Printed materialsR$ 42 thousand9.2%
Fuel and lubricantsR$ 40 thousand8.8%
Creation and inclusion of web pagesR$ 15 thousand3.3%
14 other categoriesincludes R$ 5 thousand entered as "miscellaneous, to be specified" and R$ 10 thousand donated to other candidates and partiesR$ 52 thousand11.5%
party and other campaigns 70% · individuals 13% · companies less than 1% · own funds 17%
Spending contracted
R$ 72 thousand
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
StaffR$ 20 thousand27.2%
Printed materialsR$ 9 thousand12.8%
Despesas postaisR$ 7 thousand9.4%
Locação/cessão de bens móveisR$ 7 thousand9.1%
12 other categoriesR$ 30 thousand41.5%
Running mates and alternates do not have their own campaign account: the account is that of the main candidate's ticket.
Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. 2018: TSE data of 13/09/2026. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.
This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.
State Deputy · 2018ALTERNATE5,272GGO · 56 years · White · Higher education, complete · PP · no. 11111 · see full resultcampaign finance report
State Deputy · 2010ANNULLED VOTESRENÚNCIA100GGO · 48 years · Higher education, complete · Professor de Ensino Fundamental · PV · no. 43143 · votes outside the valid votes, according to the TSE data · see full result
Deputy Mayor · 2008NOT ELECTED33,129LGoiânia, Goiás · 46 years · Higher education, complete · Professor de Ensino Médio · PV · no. 23 · a running mate does not receive individual votes · see full result
City Councillor · 2004ALTERNATE1,687LGoiânia, Goiás · 42 years · Higher education, complete · Professor de Ensino Superior · PT · no. 13400 · see full result
G é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.
A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.
The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.
