Já tem conta? Entrar
Todos Mandato Coletivo (José Roberto Mendes do Amaral) ran in 5 elections between 1998 and 2020, for city councillor, federal deputy, deputy mayor and state deputy, according to data from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). Not listed as elected in any of them in the TSE results. The highest vote was in 2006, for federal deputy for AL: 8,945 votes. In the 2020 campaign for city councillor in Maceió/AL, reported R$ 43 thousand in income: R$ 24 thousand from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 2 thousand de outras campanhas, R$ 5 thousand from private donations (3 donors and an online crowdfunding campaign) and R$ 13 thousand from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 37 thousand, mainly on production of radio, television or video programs (R$ 17 thousand), advertising with printed materials (R$ 14 thousand) and staff (R$ 4 thousand). In the 2006 campaign, already closed, reported contracted spending of R$ 58 thousand, 51% on advertising with printed materials.
See donors, suppliers and detailed spending of the campaign ›
The votes of Jose Roberto Mendes do Amaral in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.
The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. The hatched bar marks an executive running mate or an alternate senator: they do not receive individual votes, so the bar shows the ticket votes of the main candidate (hence the "ticket" next to the number). From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.
Todos Mandato Coletivo reported income and spending to the TSE in 2 campaigns: federal deputy for Alagoas in 2006, and city councillor in Maceió (AL) in 2020. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. In the most recent campaign, in 2020, reported R$ 43 thousand in income: R$ 24 thousand from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 2 thousand de outras campanhas, R$ 5 thousand from private donations (3 donors and an online crowdfunding campaign) and R$ 13 thousand from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 37 thousand, mainly on production of radio, television or video programs (R$ 17 thousand) and advertising with printed materials (R$ 14 thousand). In 2006, 51% of the R$ 58 thousand in committed spending went to advertising with printed materials.
Fundraising, where the money came from:
Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. 2020: TSE data of 12/09/2026. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.
This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.
City Councillor · 2020ALTERNATE1,385LMaceió, Alagoas · 63 years · Black · Secondary education, complete · Aposentado (exceto Servidor Público) · PT · no. 13000 · see full resultcampaign finance reportG é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.
A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.
The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.
