Já tem conta? Entrar
Professor Eucimar (Eucimar Oliveira de Almeida) ran in 4 elections between 2008 and 2016, for city councillor, state deputy and deputy mayor, according to data from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). Not listed as elected in any of them in the TSE results. The highest vote was in 2010, for state deputy for SP: 439 votes. In the 2016 campaign for city councillor in Vinhedo/SP, reported R$ 666 in income: R$ 145 de outras campanhas and R$ 520 from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 666, mainly on advertising with printed materials (R$ 490) and third-party services (R$ 145). In previous campaigns, already closed, reported contracted spending of R$ 582 in 2012 (46% on advertising with printed materials) and R$ 2 thousand in 2010.
See donors, suppliers and detailed spending of the campaign ›
The votes of Eucimar Oliveira de Almeida in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.
The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. The hatched bar marks an executive running mate or an alternate senator: they do not receive individual votes, so the bar shows the ticket votes of the main candidate (hence the "ticket" next to the number). From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.
Professor Eucimar reported income and spending to the TSE in 3 campaigns: state deputy for São Paulo in 2010, and city councillor in Vinhedo (SP) in 2012 and 2016. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. In the most recent campaign, in 2016, reported R$ 666 in income: R$ 145 de outras campanhas and R$ 520 from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 666, mainly on advertising with printed materials (R$ 490) and third-party services (R$ 145). In 2012, 46% of the R$ 582 in committed spending went to advertising with printed materials; in 2010, R$ 2 thousand in committed spending.
Fundraising, where the money came from:
Running mates and alternates do not have their own campaign account: the account is that of the main candidate's ticket.
Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.
This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.
City Councillor · 2016ALTERNATE30LVinhedo, São Paulo · 36 years · White · Higher education, complete · Servidor Público Municipal · PMDB · no. 15234 · see full result
City Councillor · 2012ALTERNATE31LVinhedo, São Paulo · 32 years · Higher education, complete · Professor de Ensino Fundamental · PMDB · no. 15333 · see full result
State Deputy · 2010ALTERNATE439GSP · 30 years · Higher education, complete · Servidor Público Municipal · PSOL · no. 50033 · see full resultcampaign finance reportG é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.
A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.
The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.
