Raised
R$ 3 thousand
no donations from individuals
Party Fund 29% · party and other campaigns 71%
Spending contracted
no spending reported in the TSE data
Já tem conta? Entrar
Jorge Braga (PT) became an alternate for state deputy for Rio de Janeiro in 2026, with 1,105 votes, according to the final results from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). Jorge Braga (Jorge Antonio da Silva Braga) ran in 5 elections between 2006 and 2026, for state deputy and city councillor. Not listed as elected in any of them in the TSE results. The highest vote was in 2006, for state deputy for RJ: 1,719 votes. In the 2018 campaign for state deputy for RJ, reported R$ 3 thousand in income: R$ 810 from the Party Fund and R$ 2 thousand de outras campanhas. In previous campaigns, already closed, reported contracted spending of R$ 5 thousand in 2012 (64% on advertising with printed materials) and R$ 1 thousand in 2008.
See donors, suppliers and detailed spending of the campaign ›
The votes of Jorge Antonio da Silva Braga in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.
The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. "Annulled votes" = votes cast in the voting machines that, according to the TSE data, do not count among the valid votes (the registration status is in the list below). From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.
Jorge Braga reported income and spending to the TSE in 4 campaigns: state deputy for Rio de Janeiro in 2006 and 2018, and city councillor in Rio de Janeiro (RJ) in 2008 and 2012. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. In the most recent campaign, in 2018, reported R$ 3 thousand in income: R$ 810 from the Party Fund and R$ 2 thousand de outras campanhas. In 2012, 64% of the R$ 5 thousand in committed spending went to advertising with printed materials; in 2008, R$ 1 thousand in committed spending.
Fundraising, where the money came from:
Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. 2018: TSE data of 13/09/2026. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.
This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.
State Deputy · 2026ALTERNATE1,105GRJ · 60 years · Black · Higher education, complete · Advogado · PT · no. 13157 · see full resultcampaign finance report
State Deputy · 2018ALTERNATE794GRJ · 52 years · Black · Higher education, complete · Advogado · PSC · no. 20288 · see full resultcampaign finance report
City Councillor · 2012ANNULLED VOTESINDEFERIDO COM RECURSO578LRio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro · 46 years · Higher education, complete · Advogado · PT · no. 13607 · votes outside the valid votes, according to the TSE data · see full resultcampaign finance reportG é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.
A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.
The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.