- Third-party servicesR$ 19 thousand77.2%
- Printed materialsR$ 2 thousand8.1%
- Legal servicesR$ 2 thousand8.1%
- Accounting servicesR$ 1 thousand4.5%
- 2 other categoriesR$ 5082.1%
Já tem conta? Entrar
Gilvani Santos (Gilvani Alves dos Santos) ran in 7 elections between 1996 and 2020, for mayor, governor, alternate senator, city councillor and vice governor, according to data from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). Not listed as elected in any of them in the TSE results. The highest vote was in 2018, for governor for SE: 4,803 votes. In the 2020 campaign for mayor in Aracaju/SE, reported R$ 12 thousand in income: R$ 8 thousand from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 3 thousand from private donations (9 donors and an online crowdfunding campaign), R$ 1 thousand from own funds and R$ 150 from other sources. Contracted spending totals R$ 25 thousand, mainly on third-party services (R$ 19 thousand), advertising with printed materials (R$ 2 thousand) and legal services (R$ 2 thousand). In the 2018 campaign, already closed, spent R$ 29 thousand, 48% on advertising with printed materials.
See donors, suppliers and detailed spending of the campaign ›
The votes of Gilvani Alves dos Santos in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.
The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. The hatched bar marks an executive running mate or an alternate senator: they do not receive individual votes, so the bar shows the ticket votes of the main candidate (hence the "ticket" next to the number). From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.
Gilvani Santos reported income and spending to the TSE in 2 campaigns: governor for Sergipe in 2018, and mayor in Aracaju (SE) in 2020. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. In the most recent campaign, in 2020, reported R$ 12 thousand in income: R$ 8 thousand from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 3 thousand from private donations (9 donors and an online crowdfunding campaign), R$ 1 thousand from own funds and R$ 150 from other sources. Contracted spending totals R$ 25 thousand, mainly on third-party services (R$ 19 thousand) and advertising with printed materials (R$ 2 thousand). In 2018, 48% of the R$ 29 thousand in spending went to advertising with printed materials.
Fundraising, where the money came from:
Running mates and alternates do not have their own campaign account: the account is that of the main candidate's ticket.
Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. 2020: TSE data of 12/09/2026; 2018: TSE data of 13/09/2026. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.
This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.
G é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.
A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.
The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.