Search

Photo of Francisco de Oliveira Viga

Chico Viga

Francisco de Oliveira Viga (legal name)
6 elections between 2002 and 2022 · latest party PDT
57 years old in 2022 · Male · Higher education, complete
Deputado

Chico Viga (Francisco de Oliveira Viga) ran in 6 elections between 2002 and 2022, for state deputy, according to data from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). He was elected 5 times: state deputy in 2022, 2018, 2010, 2006 and 2002. The highest vote was in 2022, for state deputy for AC: 5,601 votes. In the Legislative Assembly of Acre, directed R$ 14.2 million in 143 state amendments to the 2023 to 2026 budgets, to 7 municipalities; 77% of this amount has already been paid. In the 2022 campaign for state deputy for AC, reported R$ 115 thousand in income: R$ 50 thousand from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 4 thousand from private donations (4 donors) and R$ 61 thousand from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 106 thousand, mainly on advertising with printed materials (R$ 70 thousand), vehicle lending or rental (R$ 10 thousand) and legal services (R$ 10 thousand). In previous campaigns, already closed, reported contracted spending of R$ 46 thousand in 2018 (74% on advertising with printed materials) and R$ 123 thousand in 2014.

State Deputy · 2022
5,601
votes · AC
ELECTED · REMAINDER
Term ends in 2026
4 sectionsTap a section title to open or collapse it.

Vote trend across elections

5,601 votes in 2022 (elected) · 6 elections

The votes of Francisco de Oliveira Viga in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.

State Dep.

The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.

Campaign funding

2022: R$ 115 thousand in income · R$ 106 thousand em gastos

Chico Viga reported income and spending to the TSE in 5 campaigns: state deputy for Acre in 2006, 2010, 2014, 2018 and 2022. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. In the most recent campaign, in 2022, reported R$ 115 thousand in income: R$ 50 thousand from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 4 thousand from private donations (4 donors) and R$ 61 thousand from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 106 thousand, mainly on advertising with printed materials (R$ 70 thousand) and vehicle lending or rental (R$ 10 thousand). In 2018, 74% of the R$ 46 thousand in spending went to advertising with printed materials; in 2014, 41% of the R$ 123 thousand in committed spending went to locação/cessão de bens móveis.

Income in 2022R$ 115 thousandcampaign closed
Spending in 2022R$ 106 thousandcampaign closed; all paid
Spending in 2018R$ 46 thousandcampaign closed; all paid
Campaigns5from 2006 to 2022

Fundraising, where the money came from:

  • Electoral Fund (FEFC)
  • Other resources from the party and other campaigns
  • Donations from individuals (includes crowdfunding)
  • Companies (until 2014)
  • Own funds
2022State deputy, AcreSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 115 thousand
4 individual donors
FEFC 43% · individuals 3% · own funds 53%
Spending contracted
R$ 106 thousand
all paid (100%)
  • Printed materialsR$ 70 thousand66.0%
  • Vehicle lending or rentalR$ 10 thousand9.6%
  • Legal servicesR$ 10 thousand9.4%
  • Fuel and lubricantsR$ 6 thousand5.7%
  • 3 other categoriesR$ 10 thousand9.3%
2018State deputy, AcreSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 60 thousand
7 individual donors
FEFC 1% · individuals 63% · own funds 35%
Spending contracted
R$ 46 thousand
all paid (100%)
  • Printed materialsR$ 33 thousand73.5%
  • Fuel and lubricantsR$ 6 thousand13.4%
  • Third-party servicesR$ 4 thousand7.7%
  • Passagem aéreaR$ 2 thousand5.3%
  • 1 other categoryR$ 10less than 0.1%
2014State deputy, AcreSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 123 thousand
7 individual donors
party and other campaigns 8% · individuals 31% · own funds 61%
Spending contracted
R$ 123 thousand
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
  • Locação/cessão de bens móveisR$ 51 thousand41.3%
  • Printed materialsR$ 40 thousand32.3%
  • Fuel and lubricantsR$ 14 thousand11.2%
  • Vehicle lending or rentalR$ 10 thousand8.1%
  • 6 other categoriesincludes R$ 3 thousand entered as "miscellaneous, to be specified"R$ 9 thousand7.2%
See the 2 previous campaigns
2010State deputy, AcreSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 116 thousand
3 individual donors
party and other campaigns 63% · individuals 7% · own funds 30%
Spending contracted
R$ 116 thousand
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
  • Vehicle lending or rentalR$ 24 thousand20.8%
  • Printed materialsR$ 22 thousand19.3%
  • Fuel and lubricantsR$ 21 thousand18.0%
  • Third-party servicesR$ 16 thousand13.8%
  • 3 other categoriesincludes R$ 12 thousand entered as "miscellaneous, to be specified"R$ 33 thousand28.2%
2006State deputy, AcreSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 33 thousand
6 individual donors
party and other campaigns 8% · individuals 31% · companies 9% · own funds 51%
Spending contracted
R$ 33 thousand
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
  • Printed materialsR$ 18 thousand55.3%
  • Publicidade por placas, estandartes e faixasR$ 7 thousand21.9%
  • Fuel and lubricantsR$ 4 thousand11.5%
  • Impostos, contribuições e taxasR$ 750.2%
  • 3 other categoriesR$ 4 thousand11.0%

Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. 2022: TSE data of 13/09/2026; 2018: TSE data of 13/09/2026. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.

See donors, suppliers and spending ›

Legislative amendments

R$ 14.2 million directed · 77% paid · 143 amendments in 7 municipalities

Legislative Assembly of Acre. For information only, based on public data1 · summary and analysis generated with AI2 · may be out of date3 · approximate state figures4

In the Legislative Assembly of Acre, Chico Viga directed R$ 14.2 million in 143 state amendments to the 2023 to 2026 budgets, to 7 municipalities. As of the data collection at the source, 77% of this amount had been paid. The agency that received the most in the 2023 a 2026 legislative term was See (32%). The cities that received the most in the 2023 a 2026 legislative term were Rio Branco, Cruzeiro do Sul and Porto Walter. By legislative term: in the 2023 a 2026 legislative term, R$ 12.2 million in 109 amendments; in the 2019 a 2022 legislative term, R$ 2 million in 34 amendments.2

SponsoredR$ 14.2 million2023 to 2026 budgets
PaidR$ 10.9 million77% of the amount directed
Amendments143state
Municipalities7different
By budget year (legislative term 2023 a 2026)
BudgetSponsoredPaid% paidAmendmentsMunicipalities
2026R$ 5 millionR$ 2.5 million50%556
2025R$ 4 millionR$ 3.9 million98%425
2024R$ 3.2 millionR$ 2.6 million81%122
Legislative term 2023 a 2026R$ 12.2 millionR$ 9 million74%1096

Agencies that received the most (2023 a 2026)

  1. 1SeeR$ 3.9 million32.2%
  2. 2SeelR$ 3.2 million26.2%
  3. 3FemR$ 2 million16.6%

Municipalities that received the most (2023 a 2026)

  1. 1Rio BrancoR$ 8.4 million69.0%
  2. 2Cruzeiro do SulR$ 590 thousand4.9%
  3. 3Porto WalterR$ 90 thousand0.7%

Source: Governo do Acre / SEPLAN — Portal da Transparência (Emendas Parlamentares Estaduais), organized by Radar do Voto. The total leaves out blocked amendments and caucus, committee and rapporteur amendments, which do not have a single author. "Paid" is the current stage of each amendment at the source.

See all amendments in the Amendments Radar ›

  1. 1

    Disclaimer. Information for reference only, organized by Radar do Voto from public data. It does not replace checking the original source: the transparency portal of the Acre state government and the Legislative Assembly of Acre. Radar do Voto is not responsible for decisions made based only on this information. ↩

  2. 2

    Analysis generated with AI. The summary and analysis texts in this section were generated with the help of artificial intelligence from these data and may contain inaccuracies. When in doubt, the numbers from the original source prevail. ↩

  3. 3

    May be out of date. Committed and paid amounts change during the year, and this section may not reflect the most recent publication from the source. ↩

  4. 4

    About the state data. Each state publishes legislative amendments in its own format, with different levels of detail and publication deadlines. That is why there may be amendments without an identified municipality, amounts reallocated to another purpose and payments that only appear at the source some time later. The state figures in this profile are an approximation: before any formal use, check the transparency portal of the Acre state government and the Legislative Assembly of Acre. ↩

Candidacies

6 candidacies · elected in 2010, 2018 and 2022

This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.

G é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.

A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.

The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.