Já tem conta? Entrar
Dr Janúncio Rocha (Janúncio Diniz Rocha Sobrinho) ran in 6 elections between 1994 and 2022, for state deputy, city councillor and federal deputy, according to data from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). Not listed as elected in any of them in the TSE results. The highest vote was in 2006, for federal deputy for RN: 4,590 votes. In the 2022 campaign for state deputy for RN, reported R$ 23 thousand in income: R$ 2 thousand from the Party Fund, R$ 19 thousand de outras campanhas and R$ 2 thousand from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 7 thousand, mainly on advertising with stickers (R$ 4 thousand), advertising with printed materials (R$ 3 thousand) and production of jingles, vignettes and slogans (R$ 350). In previous campaigns, already closed, reported contracted spending of R$ 3 thousand in 2020 (59% on advertising with printed materials) and R$ 3 thousand in 2006.
See donors, suppliers and detailed spending of the campaign ›
The votes of Januncio Diniz Rocha Sobrinho in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.
The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.
Dr Janúncio Rocha reported income and spending to the TSE in 3 campaigns: federal deputy for Rio Grande do Norte in 2006, city councillor in Natal (RN) in 2020, and state deputy for Rio Grande do Norte in 2022. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. Did not receive the Electoral Fund (FEFC) in any of the 2 campaigns from 2018 on. In the most recent campaign, in 2022, reported R$ 23 thousand in income: R$ 2 thousand from the Party Fund, R$ 19 thousand de outras campanhas and R$ 2 thousand from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 7 thousand, mainly on advertising with stickers (R$ 4 thousand) and advertising with printed materials (R$ 3 thousand). In 2020, 59% of the R$ 3 thousand in spending went to advertising with printed materials; in 2006, 82% of the R$ 3 thousand in committed spending went to advertising with printed materials.
Fundraising, where the money came from:
Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. 2022: TSE data of 13/09/2026; 2020: TSE data of 12/09/2026. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.
This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.
State Deputy · 2022ALTERNATE664GRN · 61 years · Pardo (mixed race) · Higher education, complete · Médico · PL · no. 22200 · see full resultcampaign finance report
City Councillor · 2020289not electedLNatal, Rio Grande do Norte · 59 years · White · Higher education, complete · Médico · PODE · no. 19444 · see full resultcampaign finance reportG é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.
A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.
The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.
