Já tem conta? Entrar
Professor Pacco (Marcos Pacco Ribeiro Coelho) ran in 3 elections between 2014 and 2022, for district deputy and federal deputy, according to data from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). Not listed as elected in any of them in the TSE results. The highest vote was in 2018, for federal deputy for DF: 39,300 votes. In the Chamber of Deputies, had R$ 11.8 million committed in 10 individual amendments to the 2019 budget, to 27 municipalities; 78% has already been paid, counting carried-over payables. In the 2022 campaign for district deputy for DF, reported R$ 310 thousand in income: R$ 178 thousand from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 53 thousand from the Party Fund, R$ 21 thousand de outras campanhas and R$ 58 thousand from private donations (24 donors). Contracted spending totals R$ 239 thousand, mainly on activists and street mobilization (R$ 92 thousand), third-party services (R$ 66 thousand) and advertising with printed materials (R$ 47 thousand). In previous campaigns, already closed, reported contracted spending of R$ 944 thousand in 2018 and R$ 186 thousand in 2014.
See donors, suppliers and detailed spending of the campaign ›
The votes of Marcos Pacco Ribeiro Coelho in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.
The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.
Professor Pacco reported income and spending to the TSE in 3 campaigns: federal deputy for Distrito Federal in 2014 and 2018, and district deputy for Distrito Federal in 2022. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. In the most recent campaign, in 2022, reported R$ 310 thousand in income: R$ 178 thousand from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 53 thousand from the Party Fund, R$ 21 thousand de outras campanhas and R$ 58 thousand from private donations (24 donors). Contracted spending totals R$ 239 thousand, mainly on activists and street mobilization (R$ 92 thousand) and third-party services (R$ 66 thousand). In 2018, R$ 944 thousand in spending; in 2014, R$ 186 thousand in committed spending.
Fundraising, where the money came from:
Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. 2022: TSE data of 13/09/2026; 2018: TSE data of 13/09/2026. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.
In the Chamber of Deputies, Professor Pacco had R$ 11.8 million committed (amount pledged by the government) in 10 individual amendments to the 2019 budget (legislative term 2015 a 2018), to 27 municipalities. R$ 9.2 million (78%) has already been paid, counting carried-over payables. The area that received the most was Saúde (48%). The cities that received the most were Novo Gama, Santana do Araguaia and Salvador.2
| Budget | Committed | Paid | % paid | Amendments | Municipalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | R$ 9.8 million | R$ 7.2 million | 74% | 8 | 27 |
Areas that received the most
Municipalities that received the most
Source: Transparency Portal (CGU), organized by Radar do Voto, collected at the source in Oct 2026. Only individual amendments, including special transfers (the "Pix amendments"); the amount is the committed amount, and paid includes carried-over payables. Caucus, committee and rapporteur amendments, which do not have a single author, are in the dashboard.
See all amendments in the Amendments Radar ›
Disclaimer. Information for reference only, organized by Radar do Voto from public data. It does not replace checking the original source: the Transparency Portal (CGU) and the Chamber of Deputies website. Radar do Voto is not responsible for decisions made based only on this information. ↩
Analysis generated with AI. The summary and analysis texts in this section were generated with the help of artificial intelligence from these data and may contain inaccuracies. When in doubt, the numbers from the original source prevail. ↩
May be out of date. Committed and paid amounts change during the year, and this section may not reflect the most recent publication from the source. Data updated on 10/14/2026, collected at the source in Oct 2026. ↩
This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.
District Deputy · 2022ALTERNATE7,128GDF · 48 years · Pardo (mixed race) · Higher education, complete · Professor e Instrutor de Formação Profissional · UNIÃO · no. 44333 · see full resultcampaign finance report
Federal Deputy · 2018ALTERNATE39,300GDF · 44 years · Pardo (mixed race) · Higher education, complete · Professor de Ensino Superior · PODE · no. 1919 · see full result
Federal Deputy · 2014ALTERNATE27,966GDF · 40 years · Pardo (mixed race) · Higher education, complete · Professor de Ensino Superior · PSB · no. 4000 · see full resultG é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.
A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.
The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.
