Search

Photo of Jaci Pena Amanajás

Dr Jaci

Jaci Pena Amanajás (legal name)
6 elections between 2002 and 2022 · latest party CIDADANIA
73 years old in 2022 · Male · Higher education, complete
Médico

Dr Jaci (Jaci Pena Amanajás) ran in 6 elections between 2002 and 2022, for state deputy, according to data from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). He was elected 3 times: state deputy in 2014, 2010 and 2002. The highest vote was in 2014, for state deputy for AP: 6,965 votes. In the Legislative Assembly of Amapá, directed R$ 3.2 million in 8 state amendments to the 2023 budget, to 3 municipalities; 0% of this amount has already been paid. In the 2022 campaign for state deputy for AP, reported R$ 30 thousand in income, from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 29 thousand, mainly on advertising with printed materials (R$ 29 thousand). In previous campaigns, already closed, reported contracted spending of R$ 150 thousand in 2018 (77% on advertising with printed materials) and R$ 76 thousand in 2014.

4 sectionsTap a section title to open or collapse it.

Vote trend across elections

1,610 votes in 2022 · 6 elections

The votes of Jaci Pena Amanajás in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.

State Dep.

The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.

Campaign funding

2022: R$ 30 thousand in income · R$ 29 thousand em gastos

Dr Jaci reported income and spending to the TSE in 5 campaigns: state deputy for Amapá in 2006, 2010, 2014, 2018 and 2022. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. Did not receive the Electoral Fund (FEFC) in any of the 2 campaigns from 2018 on. In the most recent campaign, in 2022, reported R$ 30 thousand in income, from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 29 thousand, mainly on advertising with printed materials (R$ 29 thousand). In 2018, 77% of the R$ 150 thousand in spending went to advertising with printed materials; in 2014, R$ 76 thousand in committed spending.

Income in 2022R$ 30 thousandcampaign closed
Spending in 2022R$ 29 thousandcampaign closed; all paid
Spending in 2018R$ 150 thousandcampaign closed; all paid
Campaigns5from 2006 to 2022

Fundraising, where the money came from:

  • Party Fund
  • Other resources from the party and other campaigns
  • Donations from individuals (includes crowdfunding)
  • Companies (until 2014)
  • Own funds
2022State deputy, AmapáSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 30 thousand
no donations from individuals
own funds 100%
Spending contracted
R$ 29 thousand
all paid (100%)
  • Printed materialsR$ 29 thousand100.0%
2018State deputy, AmapáSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 207 thousand
donations from individuals
Party Fund 22% · party and other campaigns 73% · individuals 2% · own funds 4%
Spending contracted
R$ 150 thousand
all paid (100%)
  • Printed materialsR$ 116 thousand77.5%
  • Activists and street mobilizationR$ 14 thousand9.4%
  • Serviços próprios prestados por terceirosR$ 14 thousand9.4%
  • Advertising with stickersR$ 5 thousand3.2%
  • 2 other categoriesR$ 1 thousand0.7%
2014State deputy, AmapáSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 76 thousand
4 individual donors
individuals 23% · own funds 77%
Spending contracted
R$ 76 thousand
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
  • Printed materialsR$ 29 thousand38.2%
  • Vehicle lending or rentalR$ 19 thousand25.0%
  • Fuel and lubricantsR$ 10 thousand13.2%
  • StaffR$ 10 thousand12.5%
  • 7 other categoriesincludes R$ 1 thousand entered as "miscellaneous, to be specified"R$ 9 thousand11.2%
See the 2 previous campaigns
2010State deputy, AmapáSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 39 thousand
10 individual donors
individuals 87% · companies 10% · own funds 3%
Spending contracted
R$ 39 thousand
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
  • Printed materialsR$ 13 thousand34.7%
  • Fuel and lubricantsR$ 7 thousand17.5%
  • Vehicle lending or rentalR$ 5 thousand12.2%
  • Publicidade por placas, estandartes e faixasR$ 2 thousand5.8%
  • 2 other categoriesR$ 12 thousand29.8%
2006State deputy, AmapáSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 44 thousand
14 individual donors
individuals 57% · own funds 43%
Spending contracted
R$ 44 thousand
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
  • Printed materialsR$ 22 thousand49.0%
  • Fuel and lubricantsR$ 12 thousand27.4%
  • Despesas postaisR$ 3 thousand7.0%
  • Publicidade por placas, estandartes e faixasR$ 2 thousand5.5%
  • 4 other categoriesincludes R$ 2 thousand entered as "miscellaneous, to be specified"R$ 5 thousand11.1%

Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. 2022: TSE data of 13/09/2026; 2018: TSE data of 13/09/2026. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.

See donors, suppliers and spending ›

Legislative amendments

R$ 3.2 million directed · 0% paid · 8 amendments in 3 municipalities

Legislative Assembly of Amapá. For information only, based on public data1 · summary and analysis generated with AI2 · may be out of date3 · approximate state figures4

In the Legislative Assembly of Amapá, Dr Jaci directed R$ 3.2 million in 8 state amendments to the 2023 budget (legislative term 2019 a 2022), to 3 municipalities. As of the data collection at the source, 0% of this amount had been paid. The agency that received the most was Secretaria de Estado do Desenvolvimento das Cidades - Sdc (42%). The cities that received the most were 6041, 6173 and 6076.2

SponsoredR$ 3.2 million2023 budget
PaidR$ 00% of the amount directed
Amendments8state
Municipalities3different
By budget year
BudgetSponsoredPaid% paidAmendmentsMunicipalities
2023R$ 3.2 millionR$ 00%83

Agencies that received the most

  1. 1Secretaria de Estado do Desenvolvimento das Cidades - SdcR$ 1.4 million41.6%
  2. 2Fundo Estadual de SaúdeR$ 1 million31.1%
  3. 3Secretaria de Estado do Desenvolvimento RuralR$ 441 thousand13.6%

Municipalities that received the most

  1. 16041R$ 1.1 million34.0%
  2. 26173R$ 750 thousand23.1%
  3. 36076R$ 161 thousand5.0%

Source: Governo do Estado do Amapá — Observatório da Despesa Pública (Emendas Parlamentares Estaduais), organized by Radar do Voto. The total leaves out blocked amendments and caucus, committee and rapporteur amendments, which do not have a single author. "Paid" is the current stage of each amendment at the source.

See all amendments in the Amendments Radar ›

  1. 1

    Disclaimer. Information for reference only, organized by Radar do Voto from public data. It does not replace checking the original source: the transparency portal of the Amapá state government and the Legislative Assembly of Amapá. Radar do Voto is not responsible for decisions made based only on this information. ↩

  2. 2

    Analysis generated with AI. The summary and analysis texts in this section were generated with the help of artificial intelligence from these data and may contain inaccuracies. When in doubt, the numbers from the original source prevail. ↩

  3. 3

    May be out of date. Committed and paid amounts change during the year, and this section may not reflect the most recent publication from the source. ↩

  4. 4

    About the state data. Each state publishes legislative amendments in its own format, with different levels of detail and publication deadlines. That is why there may be amendments without an identified municipality, amounts reallocated to another purpose and payments that only appear at the source some time later. The state figures in this profile are an approximation: before any formal use, check the transparency portal of the Amapá state government and the Legislative Assembly of Amapá. ↩

Candidacies

6 candidacies · elected in 2002, 2010 and 2014

This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.

G é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.

A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.

The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.