Já tem conta? Entrar
Prof. João Eduardo Reymunde (João Eduardo Quevedo Reymunde) ran in 4 elections between 2000 and 2014, for federal deputy, state deputy and city councillor, according to data from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). Not listed as elected in any of them in the TSE results. The highest vote was in 2006, for state deputy for RS: 5,625 votes. In the 2014 campaign for federal deputy for RS, reported R$ 55 thousand in income: R$ 26 thousand de outros recursos do partido e de outras campanhas, R$ 724 from private donations and R$ 28 thousand from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 55 thousand, mainly on advertising with printed materials (R$ 32 thousand), third-party services (R$ 15 thousand) and locação/cessão de bens móveis (R$ 4 thousand). In previous campaigns, already closed, reported contracted spending of R$ 239 thousand in 2010 (71% on staff) and R$ 58 thousand in 2006.
See donors, suppliers and detailed spending of the campaign ›
The votes of João Eduardo Quevedo Reymunde in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.
The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. "Annulled votes" = votes cast in the voting machines that, according to the TSE data, do not count among the valid votes (the registration status is in the list below). From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.
Prof. João Eduardo Reymunde reported income and spending to the TSE in 3 campaigns: state deputy for Rio Grande do Sul in 2006, and federal deputy for Rio Grande do Sul in 2010 and 2014. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. In the most recent campaign, in 2014, reported R$ 55 thousand in income: R$ 26 thousand de outros recursos do partido e de outras campanhas, R$ 724 from private donations and R$ 28 thousand from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 55 thousand, mainly on advertising with printed materials (R$ 32 thousand) and third-party services (R$ 15 thousand). In 2010, 71% of the R$ 239 thousand in committed spending went to staff; in 2006, 54% of the R$ 58 thousand in committed spending went to third-party services.
Fundraising, where the money came from:
Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.
This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.
Federal Deputy · 2014ANNULLED VOTESInapto2,454GRS · 43 years · White · Higher education, complete · Professor de Ensino Médio · PMDB · no. 1562 · votes outside the valid votes, according to the TSE data · see full resultcampaign finance report
Federal Deputy · 2010ALTERNATE3,558GRS · 39 years · Higher education, complete · PTB · no. 1451 · see full resultG é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.
A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.
The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.
