Search

Photo of Diogo Wenceslau Vilhena Senior

Diogo Senior

Diogo Wenceslau Vilhena Senior (legal name)
5 elections between 2012 and 2026 · latest party MDB
45 years old in 2026 · Male · Higher education, complete
Deputado
Candidate for State Deputy · Amapá · 2026 elections · MDB · no. 15123
In office
social media reported to the TSE

Diogo Senior (MDB) was elected state deputy for Amapá in 2026, with 10,050 votes, according to the final results from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). Diogo Senior (Diogo Wenceslau Vilhena Senior) ran in 5 elections between 2012 and 2026, for state deputy and city councillor. He was elected 4 times: state deputy in 2026, 2022 and 2018; city councillor of Macapá in 2016. The highest vote was in 2026, for state deputy for AP: 10,050 votes. In the Legislative Assembly of Amapá, directed R$ 7.4 million in 26 state amendments to the 2023 to 2024 budgets, to 6 municipalities; 21% of this amount has already been paid. In the 2026 campaign for state deputy for AP, reported R$ 156 thousand in income, from the Electoral Fund (FEFC). Contracted spending totals R$ 145 thousand, mainly on advertising with printed materials (R$ 52 thousand), legal services (R$ 40 thousand) and advertising with stickers (R$ 33 thousand). Partial amounts, according to the TSE data of 18/10/2026: the campaign finance report for this election is still in progress. In previous campaigns, already closed, reported contracted spending of R$ 256 thousand in 2022 and R$ 30 thousand in 2018.

State Deputy · 2026
10,050
votes · AP
ELECTED
Term ends in 2030
4 sectionsTap a section title to open or collapse it.

Vote trend across elections

10,050 votes in 2026 (elected) · 5 elections

The votes of Diogo Wenceslau Vilhena Senior in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.

City CouncillorState Dep.

The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.

Campaign funding

2026 (partial): R$ 156 thousand in income · R$ 145 thousand em gastos contratados

Diogo Senior reported income and spending to the TSE in 5 campaigns: city councillor in Macapá (AP) in 2012 and 2016, and state deputy for Amapá in 2018, 2022 and 2026. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. In the most recent campaign, in 2026, reported R$ 156 thousand in income, from the Electoral Fund (FEFC). Contracted spending totals R$ 145 thousand, mainly on advertising with printed materials (R$ 52 thousand) and legal services (R$ 40 thousand); R$ 145 thousand has already been paid. In 2022, R$ 256 thousand in spending; in 2018, 67% of the R$ 30 thousand in committed spending went to advertising with printed materials. 2026 amounts are partial, according to the TSE data of 18/10/2026.

Income in 2026R$ 156 thousandpartial, until 18/10/2026
Spending in 2026R$ 145 thousandcontracted, partial; R$ 145 thousand paid
Spending in 2022R$ 256 thousandcampaign closed; all paid
Campaigns5from 2012 to 2026

Fundraising, where the money came from:

  • Electoral Fund (FEFC)
  • Party Fund
  • Other resources from the party and other campaigns
  • Donations from individuals (includes crowdfunding)
  • Own funds
2026partialState deputy, AmapáSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 156 thousand
no donations from individuals
FEFC 100%
Spending contracted
R$ 145 thousand
paid so far: R$ 145 thousand (100%)
  • Printed materialsR$ 52 thousand35.9%
  • Legal servicesR$ 40 thousand27.6%
  • Advertising with stickersR$ 33 thousand22.7%
  • Accounting servicesR$ 20 thousand13.8%
  • 1 other categoryR$ 2less than 0.1%
2022State deputy, AmapáSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 300 thousand
10 individual donors
FEFC 78% · party and other campaigns 6% · individuals 10% · own funds 5%
Spending contracted
R$ 256 thousand
all paid (100%)
  • Activists and street mobilizationR$ 57 thousand22.1%
  • Vehicle lending or rentalR$ 45 thousand17.6%
  • Printed materialsR$ 38 thousand14.8%
  • Advertising with stickersR$ 34 thousand13.1%
  • 7 other categoriesR$ 83 thousand32.4%
2018State deputy, AmapáSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 68 thousand
14 individual donors
Party Fund 40% · party and other campaigns 46% · individuals 14%
Spending contracted
R$ 30 thousand
paid: R$ 10 thousand (33%)
  • Printed materialsR$ 20 thousand66.7%
  • Fuel and lubricantsR$ 10 thousand33.3%
See the 2 previous campaigns
2016City councillor, Macapá (AP)See donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 30 thousand
8 individual donors
individuals 100%
Spending contracted
R$ 30 thousand
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
  • Vehicle lending or rentalR$ 14 thousand46.8%
  • Printed materialsR$ 9 thousand29.8%
  • Fuel and lubricantsR$ 5 thousand16.7%
  • Third-party servicesR$ 2 thousand6.7%
  • 1 other categoryR$ 1less than 0.1%
2012City councillor, Macapá (AP)See donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 57 thousand
5 individual donors
party and other campaigns 64% · individuals 29% · own funds 7%
Spending contracted
R$ 47 thousand
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
  • Printed materialsR$ 28 thousand60.6%
  • Fuel and lubricantsR$ 16 thousand33.2%
  • Production of radio, television or video programsR$ 2 thousand3.3%
  • Publicidade por placas, estandartes e faixasR$ 1 thousand2.9%

Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. 2026: partial amounts, according to the TSE data of 18/10/2026; 2022: TSE data of 13/09/2026; 2018: TSE data of 13/09/2026. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.

See donors, suppliers and spending ›

Legislative amendments

R$ 7.4 million directed · 21% paid · 26 amendments in 6 municipalities

Legislative Assembly of Amapá. For information only, based on public data1 · summary and analysis generated with AI2 · may be out of date3 · approximate state figures4

In the Legislative Assembly of Amapá, Diogo Senior directed R$ 7.4 million in 26 state amendments to the 2023 to 2024 budgets, to 6 municipalities. As of the data collection at the source, 21% of this amount had been paid. The agency that received the most in the 2023 a 2026 legislative term was Fundo Estadual de Saúde (24%). The cities that received the most in the 2023 a 2026 legislative term were Vitória do Jari, Santana and Macapá. By legislative term: in the 2023 a 2026 legislative term, R$ 4.2 million in 17 amendments; in the 2019 a 2022 legislative term, R$ 3.2 million in 9 amendments.2

SponsoredR$ 7.4 million2023 to 2024 budgets
PaidR$ 1.6 million21% of the amount directed
Amendments26state
Municipalities6different
By budget year (legislative term 2023 a 2026)
BudgetSponsoredPaid% paidAmendmentsMunicipalities
2024R$ 4.2 millionR$ 350 thousand8%175

Agencies that received the most (2023 a 2026)

  1. 1Fundo Estadual de SaúdeR$ 1 million24.2%
  2. 2Secretaria de Estado da EducaçãoR$ 800 thousand19.0%
  3. 3Secretaria de Estado do Desporto e do LazerR$ 634 thousand15.1%

Municipalities that received the most (2023 a 2026)

  1. 1Vitória do JariR$ 450 thousand10.7%
  2. 2SantanaR$ 404 thousand9.6%
  3. 3MacapáR$ 385 thousand9.1%

Source: Governo do Estado do Amapá — Observatório da Despesa Pública (Emendas Parlamentares Estaduais), organized by Radar do Voto. The total leaves out blocked amendments and caucus, committee and rapporteur amendments, which do not have a single author. "Paid" is the current stage of each amendment at the source.

See all amendments in the Amendments Radar ›

  1. 1

    Disclaimer. Information for reference only, organized by Radar do Voto from public data. It does not replace checking the original source: the transparency portal of the Amapá state government and the Legislative Assembly of Amapá. Radar do Voto is not responsible for decisions made based only on this information. ↩

  2. 2

    Analysis generated with AI. The summary and analysis texts in this section were generated with the help of artificial intelligence from these data and may contain inaccuracies. When in doubt, the numbers from the original source prevail. ↩

  3. 3

    May be out of date. Committed and paid amounts change during the year, and this section may not reflect the most recent publication from the source. ↩

  4. 4

    About the state data. Each state publishes legislative amendments in its own format, with different levels of detail and publication deadlines. That is why there may be amendments without an identified municipality, amounts reallocated to another purpose and payments that only appear at the source some time later. The state figures in this profile are an approximation: before any formal use, check the transparency portal of the Amapá state government and the Legislative Assembly of Amapá. ↩

Candidacies

5 candidacies · elected in 2018, 2022 and 2026

This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.

G é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.

A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.

The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.