Search

Pedro Pereira

Photo of Pedro Ozorio Pereira
Pedro Pereira
Pedro Ozorio Pereira (legal name)
12 elections between 1996 and 2026 · latest party PSD
73 years old in 2026 · Male · Higher education, complete
Médico
Candidate for State Deputy · Rio Grande do Sul · 2026 elections · PSD · no. 55600
In office
social media reported to the TSE

Pedro Pereira (PSD) became an alternate for state deputy for Rio Grande do Sul in 2026, with 20,138 votes, according to the final results from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). Pedro Pereira (Pedro Ozório Pereira) ran in 12 elections between 1996 and 2026, for state deputy, deputy mayor, mayor, federal deputy and city councillor. He was elected 6 times: state deputy in 2022, 2018, 2014, 2010 and 2006; city councillor of Canguçu in 1996. The highest vote was in 2014, for state deputy for RS: 43,535 votes. In the Legislative Assembly of Rio Grande do Sul, directed R$ 9 million in 112 state amendments to the 2023 to 2026 budgets, to 49 municipalities; 42% of this amount has already been paid. In the 2026 campaign for state deputy for RS, reported R$ 411 thousand in income: R$ 352 thousand from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 412 from the Party Fund, R$ 11 thousand de outros recursos do partido, R$ 33 thousand from private donations (8 donors) and R$ 15 thousand from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 213 thousand, mainly on advertising with printed materials (R$ 92 thousand), vehicle lending or rental (R$ 35 thousand) and accounting services (R$ 24 thousand). Partial amounts, according to the TSE data of 14/10/2026: the campaign finance report for this election is still in progress. In previous campaigns, already closed, spent R$ 336 thousand in 2022 (55% on staff) and R$ 114 thousand in 2018.

State Deputy · 2022
31,255
votes · RS
ELECTED
Term ends in 2026
4 sectionsTap a section title to open or collapse it.

Vote trend across elections

20,138 votes in 2026 · 12 elections

The votes of Pedro Ozorio Pereira in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.

City CouncillorFederal Dep.State Dep.Mayorticket votes (running mate/alternate)

The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. The hatched bar marks an executive running mate or an alternate senator: they do not receive individual votes, so the bar shows the ticket votes of the main candidate (hence the "ticket" next to the number). From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.

Campaign funding

2026 (partial): R$ 411 thousand in income · R$ 213 thousand em gastos contratados

Pedro Pereira reported income and spending to the TSE in 6 campaigns: state deputy for Rio Grande do Sul in 2006, 2010, 2014, 2018, 2022 and 2026. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. In the most recent campaign, in 2026, reported R$ 411 thousand in income: R$ 352 thousand from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 412 from the Party Fund, R$ 11 thousand de outros recursos do partido, R$ 33 thousand from private donations (8 donors) and R$ 15 thousand from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 213 thousand, mainly on advertising with printed materials (R$ 92 thousand) and vehicle lending or rental (R$ 35 thousand); R$ 88 thousand has already been paid. In 2022, 55% of the R$ 336 thousand in spending went to staff; in 2018, 66% of the R$ 114 thousand in spending went to third-party services. 2026 amounts are partial, according to the TSE data of 14/10/2026.

Income in 2026R$ 411 thousandpartial, until 14/10/2026
Spending in 2026R$ 213 thousandcontracted, partial; R$ 88 thousand paid
Spending in 2022R$ 336 thousandcampaign closed; all paid
Campaigns6from 2006 to 2026

Fundraising, where the money came from:

  • Electoral Fund (FEFC)
  • Party Fund
  • Other resources from the party and other campaigns
  • Donations from individuals (includes crowdfunding)
  • Companies (until 2014)
  • Own funds
  • Other sources
2026partialState deputy, Rio Grande do SulSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 411 thousand
8 individual donors
FEFC 86% · Party Fund less than 1% · party 3% · individuals 8% · own funds 4%
Spending contracted
R$ 213 thousand
paid so far: R$ 88 thousand (41%)
  • Printed materialsR$ 92 thousand43.0%
  • Vehicle lending or rentalR$ 35 thousand16.3%
  • Accounting servicesR$ 24 thousand11.3%
  • Third-party servicesR$ 20 thousand9.4%
  • 6 other categoriesR$ 43 thousand20.0%
2022State deputy, Rio Grande do SulSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 369 thousand
53 individual donors
FEFC 79% · party and other campaigns 5% · individuals 8% · own funds 7%
Spending contracted
R$ 336 thousand
all paid (100%)
  • StaffR$ 186 thousand55.2%
  • Printed materialsR$ 51 thousand15.1%
  • Fuel and lubricantsR$ 34 thousand10.2%
  • Third-party servicesR$ 22 thousand6.5%
  • 10 other categoriesincludes R$ 600 entered as "miscellaneous, to be specified"R$ 44 thousand13.0%
2018State deputy, Rio Grande do SulSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 158 thousand
10 individual donors
FEFC 16% · Party Fund 1% · party and other campaigns 29% · individuals 21% · own funds 33%
Spending contracted
R$ 114 thousand
all paid (100%)
  • Third-party servicesR$ 75 thousand65.6%
  • Printed materialsR$ 14 thousand11.8%
  • Fuel and lubricantsR$ 12 thousand10.4%
  • Property rentalR$ 7 thousand6.1%
  • 5 other categoriesR$ 7 thousand6.1%
See the 3 previous campaigns
2014State deputy, Rio Grande do SulSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 259 thousand
7 individual donors
party and other campaigns 55% · individuals 9% · companies 23% · own funds 13%
Spending contracted
R$ 259 thousand
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
  • Vehicle lending or rentalR$ 79 thousand30.6%
  • StaffR$ 71 thousand27.3%
  • Printed materialsR$ 46 thousand17.9%
  • Fuel and lubricantsR$ 27 thousand10.3%
  • 10 other categoriesincludes R$ 760 entered as "miscellaneous, to be specified"R$ 36 thousand13.8%
2010State deputy, Rio Grande do SulSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 139 thousand
38 individual donors
party and other campaigns less than 1% · individuals 41% · companies 4% · own funds 52% · other 3%
Spending contracted
R$ 139 thousand
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
  • Printed materialsR$ 43 thousand31.1%
  • Fuel and lubricantsR$ 12 thousand8.7%
  • Publicidade por placas, estandartes e faixasR$ 6 thousand4.2%
  • RalliesR$ 5 thousand3.6%
  • 9 other categoriesincludes R$ 2 thousand entered as "miscellaneous, to be specified"R$ 73 thousand52.4%
2006State deputy, Rio Grande do SulSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 20 thousand
9 individual donors
party and other campaigns 15% · individuals 22% · companies 15% · own funds 48%
Spending contracted
R$ 20 thousand
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
  • Fuel and lubricantsR$ 3 thousand14.4%
  • Printed materialsR$ 3 thousand14.2%
  • Property rentalR$ 2 thousand10.1%
  • Third-party servicesR$ 5402.7%
  • 7 other categoriesincludes R$ 509 entered as "miscellaneous, to be specified"R$ 12 thousand58.6%

Running mates and alternates do not have their own campaign account: the account is that of the main candidate's ticket.

Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. 2026: partial amounts, according to the TSE data of 14/10/2026; 2022: TSE data of 13/09/2026; 2018: TSE data of 13/09/2026. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.

See donors, suppliers and spending ›

Legislative amendments

R$ 9 million directed · 42% paid · 112 amendments in 49 municipalities

Legislative Assembly of Rio Grande do Sul. For information only, based on public data1 · summary and analysis generated with AI2 · may be out of date3 · approximate state figures4

In the Legislative Assembly of Rio Grande do Sul, Pedro Pereira directed R$ 9 million in 112 state amendments to the 2023 to 2026 budgets, to 49 municipalities. As of the data collection at the source, 42% of this amount had been paid. The agency that received the most in the 2023 a 2026 legislative term was Secretaria da Saúde (51%). The cities that received the most in the 2023 a 2026 legislative term were Pelotas, São Lourenço do Sul and Canguçu. By legislative term: in the 2023 a 2026 legislative term, R$ 8 million in 94 amendments; in the 2019 a 2022 legislative term, R$ 1 million in 18 amendments.2

SponsoredR$ 9 million2023 to 2026 budgets
PaidR$ 3.8 million42% of the amount directed
Amendments112state
Municipalities49different
By budget year (legislative term 2023 a 2026)
BudgetSponsoredPaid% paidAmendmentsMunicipalities
2026R$ 4 millionR$ 900 thousand23%5343
2025R$ 2 millionR$ 1.4 million70%2221
2024R$ 2 millionR$ 1.5 million73%1917
Legislative term 2023 a 2026R$ 8 millionR$ 3.8 million47%9449

Agencies that received the most (2023 a 2026)

  1. 1Secretaria da SaúdeR$ 4.1 million50.6%
  2. 2Secretaria de Desenvolvimento Urbano e MetropolitanoR$ 1.3 million15.6%
  3. 3Secretaria da CulturaR$ 650 thousand8.1%

Municipalities that received the most (2023 a 2026)

  1. 1PelotasR$ 700 thousand8.8%
  2. 2São Lourenço do SulR$ 600 thousand7.5%
  3. 3CanguçuR$ 550 thousand6.9%

Source: Transparencia RS — Emendas Parlamentares Estaduais (export Power BI, layout atual), organized by Radar do Voto. The total leaves out blocked amendments and caucus, committee and rapporteur amendments, which do not have a single author. "Paid" is the current stage of each amendment at the source.

See all amendments in the Amendments Radar ›

  1. 1

    Disclaimer. Information for reference only, organized by Radar do Voto from public data. It does not replace checking the original source: the transparency portal of the Rio Grande do Sul state government and the Legislative Assembly of Rio Grande do Sul. Radar do Voto is not responsible for decisions made based only on this information. ↩

  2. 2

    Analysis generated with AI. The summary and analysis texts in this section were generated with the help of artificial intelligence from these data and may contain inaccuracies. When in doubt, the numbers from the original source prevail. ↩

  3. 3

    May be out of date. Committed and paid amounts change during the year, and this section may not reflect the most recent publication from the source. ↩

  4. 4

    About the state data. Each state publishes legislative amendments in its own format, with different levels of detail and publication deadlines. That is why there may be amendments without an identified municipality, amounts reallocated to another purpose and payments that only appear at the source some time later. The state figures in this profile are an approximation: before any formal use, check the transparency portal of the Rio Grande do Sul state government and the Legislative Assembly of Rio Grande do Sul. ↩

Candidacies

12 candidacies · elected in 2014, 2018 and 2022

This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.

G é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.

A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.

The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.