Search

Dr. Eleuses Paiva

Photo of Eleuses Vieira de Paiva
Dr. Eleuses Paiva
Eleuses Vieira de Paiva (legal name)
4 elections between 2006 and 2018 · latest party PSD
65 years old in 2018 · Male · Higher education, complete
Médico
social media reported to the TSE

Dr. Eleuses Paiva (Eleuses Vieira de Paiva) ran in 4 elections between 2006 and 2018, for federal deputy and deputy mayor, according to data from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). He was elected 1 time: deputy mayor of São José do Rio Preto in 2016. The highest vote was in 2010, for federal deputy for SP: 107,464 votes. In the 2018 campaign for federal deputy for SP, reported R$ 2.1 million in income: R$ 1.1 million from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 500 from private donations and R$ 1.1 million from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 2.1 million, mainly on third-party services (R$ 1.3 million), activists and street mobilization (R$ 274 thousand) and advertising with printed materials (R$ 236 thousand). In previous campaigns, already closed, reported contracted spending of R$ 831 thousand in 2010 and R$ 1.1 million in 2006.

3 sectionsTap a section title to open or collapse it.

Vote trend across elections

81,160 votes in 2018 · 4 elections

The votes of Eleuses Vieira de Paiva in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.

Federal Dep.Mayorticket votes (running mate/alternate)

The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. The hatched bar marks an executive running mate or an alternate senator: they do not receive individual votes, so the bar shows the ticket votes of the main candidate (hence the "ticket" next to the number). From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.

Campaign funding

2018: R$ 2.1 million in income · R$ 2.1 million em gastos

Dr. Eleuses Paiva reported income and spending to the TSE in 3 campaigns: federal deputy for São Paulo in 2006, 2010 and 2018. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. In the most recent campaign, in 2018, reported R$ 2.1 million in income: R$ 1.1 million from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 500 from private donations and R$ 1.1 million from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 2.1 million, mainly on third-party services (R$ 1.3 million) and activists and street mobilization (R$ 274 thousand). In 2010, R$ 831 thousand in committed spending; in 2006, R$ 1.1 million in committed spending.

Income in 2018R$ 2.1 millioncampaign closed
Spending in 2018R$ 2.1 millioncampaign closed; all paid
Spending in 2010R$ 831 thousandcontracted, campaign closed
Campaigns32006, 2010 and 2018

Fundraising, where the money came from:

  • Electoral Fund (FEFC)
  • Other resources from the party and other campaigns
  • Donations from individuals (includes crowdfunding)
  • Companies (until 2014)
  • Own funds
  • Other sources
2018Federal deputy, São PauloSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 2.1 million
donations from individuals
FEFC 50% · individuals less than 1% · own funds 50%
Spending contracted
R$ 2.1 million
all paid (100%)
  • Third-party servicesR$ 1.3 million63.2%
  • Activists and street mobilizationR$ 274 thousand13.0%
  • Printed materialsR$ 236 thousand11.2%
  • Mail and postageR$ 136 thousand6.5%
  • 13 other categoriesR$ 127 thousand6.1%
2010Federal deputy, São PauloSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 831 thousand
21 individual donors
party and other campaigns 2% · individuals 6% · companies 40% · own funds 52%
Spending contracted
R$ 831 thousand
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
  • Printed materialsR$ 229 thousand27.5%
  • Third-party servicesR$ 225 thousand27.1%
  • Vehicle lending or rentalR$ 95 thousand11.4%
  • Publicidade por placas, estandartes e faixasR$ 67 thousand8.0%
  • 17 other categoriesR$ 217 thousand26.1%
2006Federal deputy, São PauloSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 1.4 million
23 individual donors
party and other campaigns less than 1% · individuals 2% · companies 38% · own funds 59% · other 1%
Spending contracted
R$ 1.1 million
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
  • StaffR$ 294 thousand25.9%
  • Printed materialsR$ 210 thousand18.5%
  • Property rentalR$ 85 thousand7.5%
  • Social chargesR$ 85 thousand7.5%
  • 24 other categoriesincludes R$ 5 thousand entered as "miscellaneous, to be specified"R$ 460 thousand40.5%

Running mates and alternates do not have their own campaign account: the account is that of the main candidate's ticket.

Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. 2018: TSE data of 13/09/2026. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.

See donors, suppliers and spending ›

Candidacies

4 candidacies · elected in 2016

This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.

G é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.

A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.

The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.