Macabu (Alexandre da Silva Macabu) ran in 2 elections between 2008 and 2018, for federal deputy and city councillor, according to data from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). Not listed as elected in any of them in the TSE results. The highest vote was in 2018, for federal deputy for RJ: 739 votes. In the 2018 campaign for federal deputy for RJ, reported R$ 14 thousand in income: R$ 10 thousand from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 810 from the Party Fund, R$ 2 thousand de outras campanhas, R$ 1 thousand from private donations and R$ 13 from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 11 thousand, mainly on staff (R$ 3 thousand), production of jingles, vignettes and slogans (R$ 1 thousand) and financial charges, bank fees and/or credit card operations (R$ 26).
3 sectionsTap a section title to open or collapse it.
1
Vote trend across elections
739 votes in 2018 · 2 elections
The votes of Alexandre da Silva Macabu in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.
The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.
2
Campaign funding
2018: R$ 14 thousand in income · R$ 11 thousand em gastos
Macabu reported income and spending to the TSE in 1 campaign: federal deputy for Rio de Janeiro in 2018. In the most recent campaign, in 2018, reported R$ 14 thousand in income: R$ 10 thousand from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 810 from the Party Fund, R$ 2 thousand de outras campanhas, R$ 1 thousand from private donations and R$ 13 from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 11 thousand, mainly on staff (R$ 3 thousand) and production of jingles, vignettes and slogans (R$ 1 thousand).
Income in 2018R$ 14 thousandcampaign closed
Spending in 2018R$ 11 thousandcampaign closed; all paid
Campaigns12018
Fundraising, where the money came from:
Electoral Fund (FEFC)
Party Fund
Other resources from the party and other campaigns
Donations from individuals (includes crowdfunding)
FEFC 72% · Party Fund 6% · party and other campaigns 15% · individuals 7% · own funds less than 1%
Spending contracted
R$ 11 thousand
all paid (100%)
StaffR$ 3 thousand27.3%
Production of jingles, vignettes and slogansR$ 1 thousand9.1%
Financial charges, bank fees and/or credit card operationsR$ 260.2%
1 other categoryincludes R$ 7 thousand entered as "miscellaneous, to be specified"R$ 7 thousand63.3%
Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. 2018: TSE data of 13/09/2026. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.
City Councillor · 2008ALTERNATE696LNova Iguaçu, Rio de Janeiro · 36 years · Secondary education, complete · Supervisor, Inspetor e Agente de Compras e Vendas · PTB · no. 14222 · see full result
G é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.
A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.
The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.