Raised
R$ 77
no donations from individuals
party 100%
Spending contracted
no spending reported in the TSE data
Já tem conta? Entrar
Dr Anderson Silva (Anderson dos Santos Silva) ran in 4 elections between 2012 and 2020, for city councillor and federal deputy, according to data from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). Not listed as elected in any of them in the TSE results. The highest vote was in 2014, for federal deputy for SP: 3,302 votes. In the 2020 campaign for city councillor in São Caetano do Sul/SP, reported R$ 77 in income, de outros recursos do partido. In previous campaigns, already closed, reported contracted spending of R$ 6 thousand in 2016 (68% on staff) and R$ 7 thousand in 2014.
See donors, suppliers and detailed spending of the campaign ›
The votes of Anderson dos Santos Silva in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.
The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. "Annulled votes" = votes cast in the voting machines that, according to the TSE data, do not count among the valid votes (the registration status is in the list below). From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.
Dr Anderson Silva reported income and spending to the TSE in 4 campaigns: city councillor in São Caetano do Sul (SP) in 2012, 2016 and 2020, and federal deputy for São Paulo in 2014. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. In the most recent campaign, in 2020, reported R$ 77 in income, de outros recursos do partido. In 2016, 68% of the R$ 6 thousand in committed spending went to staff; in 2014, 81% of the R$ 7 thousand in committed spending went to production of radio, television or video programs.
Fundraising, where the money came from:
Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. 2020: TSE data of 12/09/2026. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.
This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.
City Councillor · 2020ANNULLED VOTESINDEFERIDO17LSão Caetano do Sul, São Paulo · 47 years · White · Higher education, complete · Servidor Público Municipal · DEM · no. 25153 · votes outside the valid votes, according to the TSE data · see full resultcampaign finance report
City Councillor · 2016ALTERNATE151LSão Caetano do Sul, São Paulo · 43 years · White · Higher education, complete · Servidor Público Municipal · DEM · no. 25153 · see full resultcampaign finance report
Federal Deputy · 2014ALTERNATE3,302GSP · 41 years · White · Higher education, complete · Servidor Público Municipal · PSDB · no. 4546 · see full result
City Councillor · 2012ALTERNATE192LSão Caetano do Sul, São Paulo · 39 years · Higher education, incomplete · PSDB · no. 45123 · see full resultG é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.
A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.
The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.