Search

Photo of Rodrigo Marques Lorenzoni

Rodrigo Lorenzoni

Rodrigo Marques Lorenzoni (legal name)
3 elections between 2018 and 2026 · latest party PP
47 years old in 2026 · Male · Higher education, complete
Veterinário
Candidate for State Deputy · Rio Grande do Sul · 2026 elections · PP · no. 11022
In office
social media reported to the TSE

Rodrigo Lorenzoni (PP) became an alternate for state deputy for Rio Grande do Sul in 2026, with 27,535 votes, according to the final results from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). Rodrigo Lorenzoni (Rodrigo Marques Lorenzoni) ran in 3 elections between 2018 and 2026, for state deputy. He was elected 1 time: state deputy in 2022. The highest vote was in 2022, for state deputy for RS: 85,692 votes. In the Legislative Assembly of Rio Grande do Sul, directed R$ 9 million in 104 state amendments to the 2023 to 2026 budgets, to 57 municipalities; 54% of this amount has already been paid. In the 2026 campaign for state deputy for RS, reported R$ 1.1 million in income: R$ 655 thousand from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 177 thousand de outros recursos do partido e de outras campanhas, R$ 311 thousand from private donations (139 donors and an online crowdfunding campaign) and R$ 2 thousand from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 974 thousand, mainly on third-party services (R$ 179 thousand), advertising with printed materials (R$ 162 thousand) and content boosting (R$ 135 thousand). Partial amounts, according to the TSE data of 14/10/2026: the campaign finance report for this election is still in progress. In previous campaigns, already closed, spent R$ 803 thousand in 2022 and R$ 223 thousand in 2018.

State Deputy · 2022
85,692
votes · RS
ELECTED
Term ends in 2026
4 sectionsTap a section title to open or collapse it.

Vote trend across elections

27,535 votes in 2026 · 3 elections

The votes of Rodrigo Marques Lorenzoni in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.

State Dep.

The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.

Campaign funding

2026 (partial): R$ 1.1 million in income · R$ 974 thousand em gastos contratados

Rodrigo Lorenzoni reported income and spending to the TSE in 3 campaigns: state deputy for Rio Grande do Sul in 2018, 2022 and 2026. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. In the most recent campaign, in 2026, reported R$ 1.1 million in income: R$ 655 thousand from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 177 thousand de outros recursos do partido e de outras campanhas, R$ 311 thousand from private donations (139 donors and an online crowdfunding campaign) and R$ 2 thousand from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 974 thousand, mainly on third-party services (R$ 179 thousand) and advertising with printed materials (R$ 162 thousand); R$ 965 thousand has already been paid. In 2022, R$ 803 thousand in spending; in 2018, R$ 223 thousand in spending. 2026 amounts are partial, according to the TSE data of 14/10/2026.

Income in 2026R$ 1.1 millionpartial, until 14/10/2026
Spending in 2026R$ 974 thousandcontracted, partial; R$ 965 thousand paid
Spending in 2022R$ 803 thousandcampaign closed; all paid
Campaigns32018, 2022 and 2026

Fundraising, where the money came from:

  • Electoral Fund (FEFC)
  • Party Fund
  • Other resources from the party and other campaigns
  • Donations from individuals (includes crowdfunding)
  • Own funds
2026partialState deputy, Rio Grande do SulSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 1.1 million
139 individual donors and an online crowdfunding campaign
FEFC 57% · party and other campaigns 15% · individuals 27% · own funds less than 1%
Spending contracted
R$ 974 thousand
paid so far: R$ 965 thousand (99%)
  • Third-party servicesR$ 179 thousand18.4%
  • Printed materialsR$ 162 thousand16.7%
  • Content boostingR$ 135 thousand13.9%
  • StaffR$ 103 thousand10.6%
  • 15 other categoriesincludes R$ 24 thousand entered as "miscellaneous, to be specified"R$ 394 thousand40.5%
2022State deputy, Rio Grande do SulSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 872 thousand
103 individual donors and an online crowdfunding campaign
FEFC 34% · Party Fund 2% · party and other campaigns 6% · individuals 57% · own funds less than 1%
Spending contracted
R$ 803 thousand
all paid (100%)
  • Printed materialsR$ 280 thousand34.9%
  • Activists and street mobilizationR$ 141 thousand17.5%
  • Content boostingR$ 114 thousand14.2%
  • Mail and postageR$ 60 thousand7.5%
  • 17 other categoriesincludes R$ 25 thousand donated to other candidates and partiesR$ 207 thousand25.8%
2018State deputy, Rio Grande do SulSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 231 thousand
30 individual donors and an online crowdfunding campaign
party and other campaigns 11% · individuals 89%
Spending contracted
R$ 223 thousand
all paid (100%)
  • StaffR$ 57 thousand25.4%
  • Activists and street mobilizationR$ 56 thousand25.0%
  • Printed materialsR$ 45 thousand20.0%
  • Content boostingR$ 21 thousand9.4%
  • 15 other categoriesR$ 45 thousand20.1%

Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. 2026: partial amounts, according to the TSE data of 14/10/2026; 2022: TSE data of 13/09/2026; 2018: TSE data of 13/09/2026. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.

See donors, suppliers and spending ›

Legislative amendments

R$ 9 million directed · 54% paid · 104 amendments in 57 municipalities

Legislative Assembly of Rio Grande do Sul. For information only, based on public data1 · summary and analysis generated with AI2 · may be out of date3 · approximate state figures4

In the Legislative Assembly of Rio Grande do Sul, Rodrigo Lorenzoni directed R$ 9 million in 104 state amendments to the 2023 to 2026 budgets, to 57 municipalities. As of the data collection at the source, 54% of this amount had been paid. The agency that received the most in the 2023 a 2026 legislative term was Secretaria da Saúde (66%). The cities that received the most in the 2023 a 2026 legislative term were Porto Alegre, Alvorada and Guaíba. By legislative term: in the 2023 a 2026 legislative term, R$ 8 million in 94 amendments; in the 2019 a 2022 legislative term, R$ 1 million in 10 amendments.2

SponsoredR$ 9 million2023 to 2026 budgets
PaidR$ 4.9 million54% of the amount directed
Amendments104state
Municipalities57different
By budget year (legislative term 2023 a 2026)
BudgetSponsoredPaid% paidAmendmentsMunicipalities
2026R$ 4 millionR$ 1.3 million31%5348
2025R$ 2 millionR$ 2 million100%1614
2024R$ 2 millionR$ 1.7 million83%2523
Legislative term 2023 a 2026R$ 8 millionR$ 4.9 million61%9456

Agencies that received the most (2023 a 2026)

  1. 1Secretaria da SaúdeR$ 5.3 million66.3%
  2. 2Secretaria do Esporte e LazerR$ 850 thousand10.6%
  3. 3Secretaria de Desenvolvimento SocialR$ 700 thousand8.8%

Municipalities that received the most (2023 a 2026)

  1. 1Porto AlegreR$ 1.2 million15.0%
  2. 2AlvoradaR$ 900 thousand11.3%
  3. 3GuaíbaR$ 500 thousand6.3%

Source: Transparencia RS — Emendas Parlamentares Estaduais (export Power BI, layout atual), organized by Radar do Voto. The total leaves out blocked amendments and caucus, committee and rapporteur amendments, which do not have a single author. "Paid" is the current stage of each amendment at the source.

See all amendments in the Amendments Radar ›

  1. 1

    Disclaimer. Information for reference only, organized by Radar do Voto from public data. It does not replace checking the original source: the transparency portal of the Rio Grande do Sul state government and the Legislative Assembly of Rio Grande do Sul. Radar do Voto is not responsible for decisions made based only on this information. ↩

  2. 2

    Analysis generated with AI. The summary and analysis texts in this section were generated with the help of artificial intelligence from these data and may contain inaccuracies. When in doubt, the numbers from the original source prevail. ↩

  3. 3

    May be out of date. Committed and paid amounts change during the year, and this section may not reflect the most recent publication from the source. ↩

  4. 4

    About the state data. Each state publishes legislative amendments in its own format, with different levels of detail and publication deadlines. That is why there may be amendments without an identified municipality, amounts reallocated to another purpose and payments that only appear at the source some time later. The state figures in this profile are an approximation: before any formal use, check the transparency portal of the Rio Grande do Sul state government and the Legislative Assembly of Rio Grande do Sul. ↩

Candidacies

3 candidacies · elected in 2022

This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.

G é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.

A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.

The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.