Search

Photo of Antonio Juscicleiton Silva

Cleiton da Policlínica

Antonio Juscicleiton Silva (legal name)
3 elections between 2020 and 2026 · latest party PSDB
58 years old in 2026 · Male · Higher education, complete
Servidor Público Estadual
Candidate for State Deputy · Rio Grande do Norte · 2026 elections · PSDB · no. 45321
social media reported to the TSE

Cleiton da Policlínica (PSDB) became an alternate for state deputy for Rio Grande do Norte in 2026, with 2,174 votes, according to the final results from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). Cleiton da Policlínica (Antonio Juscicleiton Silva) ran in 3 elections between 2020 and 2026, for state deputy and city councillor. Not listed as elected in any of them in the TSE results. The highest vote was in 2024, for city councillor in Natal/RN: 3,749 votes. In the 2026 campaign for state deputy for RN, reported R$ 42 thousand in income: R$ 23 thousand from private donations (5 donors) and R$ 19 thousand from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 30 thousand, mainly on accounting services (R$ 10 thousand), third-party services (R$ 7 thousand) and legal services (R$ 5 thousand). Partial amounts, according to the TSE data of 14/10/2026: the campaign finance report for this election is still in progress. In previous campaigns, already closed, spent R$ 14 thousand in 2024 and R$ 12 thousand in 2020.

3 sectionsTap a section title to open or collapse it.

Vote trend across elections

2,174 votes in 2026 · 3 elections

The votes of Antonio Juscicleiton Silva in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.

City CouncillorState Dep.

The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.

Campaign funding

2026 (partial): R$ 42 thousand in income · R$ 30 thousand em gastos contratados

Cleiton da Policlínica reported income and spending to the TSE in 3 campaigns: city councillor in Natal (RN) in 2020 and 2024, and state deputy for Rio Grande do Norte in 2026. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. Did not receive the Electoral Fund (FEFC) in any of the 3 campaigns from 2018 on. In the most recent campaign, in 2026, reported R$ 42 thousand in income: R$ 23 thousand from private donations (5 donors) and R$ 19 thousand from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 30 thousand, mainly on accounting services (R$ 10 thousand) and third-party services (R$ 7 thousand); R$ 30 thousand has already been paid. In 2024, R$ 14 thousand in spending; in 2020, R$ 12 thousand in spending. 2026 amounts are partial, according to the TSE data of 14/10/2026.

Income in 2026R$ 42 thousandpartial, until 14/10/2026
Spending in 2026R$ 30 thousandcontracted, partial; R$ 30 thousand paid
Spending in 2024R$ 14 thousandcampaign closed; all paid
Campaigns32020, 2024 and 2026

Fundraising, where the money came from:

  • Party Fund
  • Other resources from the party and other campaigns
  • Donations from individuals (includes crowdfunding)
  • Own funds
2026partialState deputy, Rio Grande do NorteSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 42 thousand
5 individual donors
individuals 55% · own funds 45%
Spending contracted
R$ 30 thousand
paid so far: R$ 30 thousand (100%)
  • Accounting servicesR$ 10 thousand33.6%
  • Third-party servicesR$ 7 thousand23.5%
  • Legal servicesR$ 5 thousand16.8%
  • Printed materialsR$ 4 thousand14.1%
  • 3 other categoriesR$ 4 thousand12.1%
2024City councillor, Natal (RN)See donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 46 thousand
13 individual donors
Party Fund 9% · party and other campaigns 45% · individuals 44% · own funds 2%
Spending contracted
R$ 14 thousand
all paid (100%)
  • Accounting servicesR$ 5 thousand36.6%
  • Third-party servicesR$ 4 thousand26.3%
  • Production of jingles, vignettes and slogansR$ 2 thousand13.2%
  • Printed materialsR$ 2 thousand12.3%
  • 2 other categoriesR$ 2 thousand11.7%
2020City councillor, Natal (RN)See donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 25 thousand
22 individual donors
individuals 72% · own funds 28%
Spending contracted
R$ 12 thousand
all paid (100%)
  • Printed materialsR$ 3 thousand21.2%
  • Advertising with stickersR$ 2 thousand18.7%
  • Legal servicesR$ 2 thousand16.7%
  • Accounting servicesR$ 2 thousand16.7%
  • 7 other categoriesincludes R$ 180 entered as "miscellaneous, to be specified"R$ 3 thousand26.8%

Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. 2026: partial amounts, according to the TSE data of 14/10/2026; 2024: TSE data of 14/09/2026; 2020: TSE data of 12/09/2026. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.

See donors, suppliers and spending ›

Candidacies

3 candidacies

This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.

G é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.

A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.

The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.