Search

Arnaldo Jardim

Photo of Arnaldo Calil Pereira Jardim
Arnaldo Jardim
Arnaldo Calil Pereira Jardim (legal name)
9 elections between 1990 and 2022 · latest party CIDADANIA
67 years old in 2022 · Male · Higher education, complete
Deputado
social media reported to the TSE

Arnaldo Jardim (Arnaldo Calil Pereira Jardim) ran in 9 elections between 1990 and 2022, for federal deputy, state deputy and vice governor, according to data from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). He was elected 8 times: federal deputy in 2022, 2018, 2014, 2010 and 2006; state deputy in 2002, 1998 and 1990. The highest vote was in 2006, for federal deputy for SP: 187,427 votes. In the Chamber of Deputies, had R$ 237.3 million committed in 81 individual amendments to the 2016 to 2026 budgets, to 198 municipalities; 93% has already been paid, counting carried-over payables. In the 2022 campaign for federal deputy for SP, reported R$ 3.8 million in income: R$ 1.9 million from the Electoral Fund (FEFC) and R$ 1.9 million from private donations (67 donors). Contracted spending totals R$ 3.5 million, mainly on staff (R$ 1.8 million), advertising with printed materials (R$ 645 thousand) and legal services (R$ 300 thousand). In previous campaigns, already closed, reported contracted spending of R$ 2.3 million in 2018 (49% on staff) and R$ 4.8 million in 2014.

Federal Deputy · 2022
113,462
votes · SP
ELECTED
Term ends in 2026
4 sectionsTap a section title to open or collapse it.

Vote trend across elections

113,462 votes in 2022 (elected) · 9 elections

The votes of Arnaldo Calil Pereira Jardim in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.

State Dep.GovernorFederal Dep.ticket votes (running mate/alternate)

The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. The hatched bar marks an executive running mate or an alternate senator: they do not receive individual votes, so the bar shows the ticket votes of the main candidate (hence the "ticket" next to the number). From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.

Campaign funding

2022: R$ 3.8 million in income · R$ 3.5 million em gastos

Arnaldo Jardim reported income and spending to the TSE in 5 campaigns: federal deputy for São Paulo in 2006, 2010, 2014, 2018 and 2022. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. In the most recent campaign, in 2022, reported R$ 3.8 million in income: R$ 1.9 million from the Electoral Fund (FEFC) and R$ 1.9 million from private donations (67 donors). Contracted spending totals R$ 3.5 million, mainly on staff (R$ 1.8 million) and advertising with printed materials (R$ 645 thousand). In 2018, 49% of the R$ 2.3 million in spending went to staff; in 2014, 61% of the R$ 4.8 million in committed spending went to staff.

Income in 2022R$ 3.8 millioncampaign closed
Spending in 2022R$ 3.5 millioncampaign closed; all paid
Spending in 2018R$ 2.3 millioncampaign closed; all paid
Campaigns5from 2006 to 2022

Fundraising, where the money came from:

  • Electoral Fund (FEFC)
  • Other resources from the party and other campaigns
  • Donations from individuals (includes crowdfunding)
  • Companies (until 2014)
  • Own funds
2022Federal deputy, São PauloSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 3.8 million
67 individual donors
FEFC 51% · individuals 49%
Spending contracted
R$ 3.5 million
all paid (100%)
  • StaffR$ 1.8 million51.4%
  • Printed materialsR$ 645 thousand18.7%
  • Legal servicesR$ 300 thousand8.7%
  • Third-party servicesR$ 179 thousand5.2%
  • 16 other categoriesR$ 553 thousand16.0%
2018Federal deputy, São PauloSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 2.3 million
73 individual donors
FEFC 51% · party 3% · individuals 47%
Spending contracted
R$ 2.3 million
all paid (100%)
  • StaffR$ 1.1 million49.5%
  • Printed materialsR$ 821 thousand35.7%
  • Advertising with stickersR$ 130 thousand5.7%
  • Advertising in newspapers and magazinesR$ 51 thousand2.2%
  • 16 other categoriesR$ 158 thousand6.9%
2014Federal deputy, São PauloSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 4.8 million
9 individual donors
party and other campaigns 23% · individuals 3% · companies 73% · own funds less than 1%
Spending contracted
R$ 4.8 million
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
  • StaffR$ 2.9 million61.1%
  • Printed materialsR$ 973 thousand20.2%
  • Publicidade por placas, estandartes e faixasR$ 526 thousand10.9%
  • Third-party servicesR$ 118 thousand2.5%
  • 17 other categoriesincludes R$ 6 thousand entered as "miscellaneous, to be specified"R$ 252 thousand5.2%
See the 2 previous campaigns
2010Federal deputy, São PauloSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 2.8 million
9 individual donors
party and other campaigns 10% · individuals 5% · companies 85%
Spending contracted
R$ 2.7 million
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
  • StaffR$ 1.1 million40.9%
  • Publicidade por placas, estandartes e faixasR$ 533 thousand19.5%
  • Printed materialsR$ 506 thousand18.5%
  • Third-party servicesR$ 108 thousand4.0%
  • 20 other categoriesincludes R$ 11 thousand entered as "miscellaneous, to be specified" and R$ 90 thousand donated to other candidates and partiesR$ 466 thousand17.1%
2006Federal deputy, São PauloSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 1 million
24 individual donors
individuals 4% · companies 95% · own funds less than 1%
Spending contracted
R$ 1 million
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
  • Printed materialsR$ 381 thousand37.9%
  • Publicidade por placas, estandartes e faixasR$ 211 thousand21.0%
  • Third-party servicesR$ 137 thousand13.7%
  • Despesas postaisR$ 66 thousand6.6%
  • 18 other categoriesR$ 209 thousand20.8%

Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. 2022: TSE data of 13/09/2026; 2018: TSE data of 13/09/2026. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.

See donors, suppliers and spending ›

Legislative amendments

R$ 237.3 million committed · 93% paid · 81 amendments in 198 municipalities

Chamber of Deputies. For information only, based on public data1 · summary and analysis generated with AI2 · data updated on 10/14/20263

In the Chamber of Deputies, Arnaldo Jardim had R$ 237.3 million committed (amount pledged by the government) in 81 individual amendments to the 2016 to 2026 budgets, to 198 municipalities. R$ 221.1 million (93%) has already been paid, counting carried-over payables. The area that received the most in the 2023 a 2026 legislative term was Saúde (55%). The cities that received the most in the 2023 a 2026 legislative term were Pederneiras, Mogi Guaçu and Boituva. By legislative term: in the 2023 a 2026 legislative term, R$ 103.4 million in 16 amendments; in the 2019 a 2022 legislative term, R$ 81.5 million in 28 amendments; in the 2015 a 2018 legislative term, R$ 52.4 million in 37 amendments.2

CommittedR$ 237.3 million2016 to 2026 budgets
PaidR$ 221.1 million93% of the committed amount, with carried-over payables
Amendments81individual
Municipalities198different
By budget year (legislative term 2023 a 2026)
BudgetCommittedPaid% paidAmendmentsMunicipalities
2026R$ 29.5 millionR$ 21.8 million74%661
2025R$ 36 millionR$ 34.7 million96%595
2024R$ 37.9 millionR$ 36.8 million97%555
Legislative term 2023 a 2026R$ 103.4 millionR$ 93.3 million90%16135

Areas that received the most (2023 a 2026)

  1. 1SaúdeR$ 56.7 million54.8%
  2. 2Encargos EspeciaisR$ 46.7 million45.2%

Municipalities that received the most (2023 a 2026)

  1. 1PederneirasR$ 4.1 million4.0%
  2. 2Mogi GuaçuR$ 3 million2.9%
  3. 3BoituvaR$ 2.7 million2.6%

Source: Transparency Portal (CGU), organized by Radar do Voto, collected at the source in Oct 2026. Only individual amendments, including special transfers (the "Pix amendments"); the amount is the committed amount, and paid includes carried-over payables. Caucus, committee and rapporteur amendments, which do not have a single author, are in the dashboard.

See all amendments in the Amendments Radar ›

  1. 1

    Disclaimer. Information for reference only, organized by Radar do Voto from public data. It does not replace checking the original source: the Transparency Portal (CGU) and the Chamber of Deputies website. Radar do Voto is not responsible for decisions made based only on this information. ↩

  2. 2

    Analysis generated with AI. The summary and analysis texts in this section were generated with the help of artificial intelligence from these data and may contain inaccuracies. When in doubt, the numbers from the original source prevail. ↩

  3. 3

    May be out of date. Committed and paid amounts change during the year, and this section may not reflect the most recent publication from the source. Data updated on 10/14/2026, collected at the source in Oct 2026. ↩

Candidacies

9 candidacies · elected in 2014, 2018 and 2022

This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.

G é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.

A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.

The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.