Search

Superzefa

Photo of Regina Celia de Souza Bento Sequeira
Superzefa
Regina Celia de Souza Bento Sequeira (legal name)
12 elections between 2004 and 2026 · latest party PL
66 years old in 2026 · Female · Higher education, complete
Corretor de Imóveis, Seguros, Títulos e Valores
Candidate for State Deputy · Rio de Janeiro · 2026 elections · PL · no. 22321
social media reported to the TSE

Superzefa (PL) became an alternate for state deputy for Rio de Janeiro in 2026, with 956 votes, according to the final results from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). Superzefa (Regina Célia de Souza Bento Sequeira) ran in 12 elections between 2004 and 2026, for state deputy, city councillor and federal deputy. Not listed as elected in any of them in the TSE results. The highest vote was in 2006, for federal deputy for RJ: 5,713 votes. In the 2026 campaign for state deputy for RJ, reported R$ 63 thousand in income: R$ 50 thousand from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 11 thousand from the Party Fund and R$ 3 thousand de outras campanhas. Contracted spending totals R$ 39 thousand, mainly on content boosting (R$ 20 thousand), staff (R$ 12 thousand) and third-party services (R$ 7 thousand). Partial amounts, according to the TSE data of 14/10/2026: the campaign finance report for this election is still in progress. In previous campaigns, already closed, spent R$ 41 thousand in 2024 (66% on content boosting) and R$ 10 thousand in 2022.

3 sectionsTap a section title to open or collapse it.

Vote trend across elections

956 votes in 2026 · 12 elections

The votes of Regina Celia de Souza Bento Sequeira in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.

City CouncillorFederal Dep.State Dep.

The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.

Campaign funding

2026 (partial): R$ 63 thousand in income · R$ 39 thousand em gastos contratados

Superzefa reported income and spending to the TSE in 8 campaigns: city councillor in São João de Meriti (RJ) in 2008, city councillor in Rio de Janeiro (RJ) in 2012, 2020 and 2024, federal deputy for Rio de Janeiro in 2014 and 2022, and state deputy for Rio de Janeiro in 2018 and 2026. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. In the most recent campaign, in 2026, reported R$ 63 thousand in income: R$ 50 thousand from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 11 thousand from the Party Fund and R$ 3 thousand de outras campanhas. Contracted spending totals R$ 39 thousand, mainly on content boosting (R$ 20 thousand) and staff (R$ 12 thousand); R$ 38 thousand has already been paid. In 2024, 66% of the R$ 41 thousand in spending went to content boosting; in 2022, 65% of the R$ 10 thousand in spending went to third-party services. 2026 amounts are partial, according to the TSE data of 14/10/2026.

Income in 2026R$ 63 thousandpartial, until 14/10/2026
Spending in 2026R$ 39 thousandcontracted, partial; R$ 38 thousand paid
Spending in 2024R$ 41 thousandcampaign closed; all paid
Campaigns8from 2008 to 2026

Fundraising, where the money came from:

  • Electoral Fund (FEFC)
  • Party Fund
  • Other resources from the party and other campaigns
  • Donations from individuals (includes crowdfunding)
  • Own funds
2026partialState deputy, Rio de JaneiroSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 63 thousand
no donations from individuals
FEFC 79% · Party Fund 17% · party and other campaigns 4%
Spending contracted
R$ 39 thousand
paid so far: R$ 38 thousand (96%)
  • Content boostingR$ 20 thousand50.8%
  • StaffR$ 12 thousand30.5%
  • Third-party servicesR$ 7 thousand18.8%
  • Financial charges, bank fees and/or credit card operationsR$ 4less than 0.1%
2024City councillor, Rio de Janeiro (RJ)See donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 49 thousand
no donations from individuals
FEFC 82% · party and other campaigns 16% · own funds 3%
Spending contracted
R$ 41 thousand
all paid (100%)
  • Content boostingR$ 27 thousand65.9%
  • StaffR$ 7 thousand16.7%
  • Creation and inclusion of web pagesR$ 6 thousand14.9%
  • Printed materialsR$ 6991.7%
  • 2 other categoriesR$ 3300.8%
2022Federal deputy, Rio de JaneiroSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 18 thousand
no donations from individuals
FEFC 100%
Spending contracted
R$ 10 thousand
all paid (100%)
  • Third-party servicesR$ 6 thousand64.7%
  • Financial charges, bank fees and/or credit card operationsR$ 220.2%
  • 1 other categoryincludes R$ 4 thousand entered as "miscellaneous, to be specified"R$ 4 thousand35.1%
See the 5 previous campaigns
2020City councillor, Rio de Janeiro (RJ)See donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 29 thousand
no donations from individuals
FEFC 99% · Party Fund less than 1% · party and other campaigns less than 1%
Spending contracted
R$ 29 thousand
all paid (100%)
  • Printed materialsR$ 20 thousand70.4%
  • Activists and street mobilizationR$ 5 thousand17.3%
  • Creation and inclusion of web pagesR$ 2 thousand7.1%
  • Accounting servicesR$ 1 thousand3.5%
  • 2 other categoriesR$ 5151.8%
2018State deputy, Rio de JaneiroSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 11 thousand
donations from individuals
FEFC 94% · Party Fund 5% · individuals less than 1%
Spending contracted
R$ 10 thousand
all paid (100%)
  • Advertising with stickersR$ 6 thousand60.0%
  • Printed materialsR$ 4 thousand40.0%
2014Federal deputy, Rio de JaneiroSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 1 thousand
donations from individuals
individuals 100%
Spending contracted
R$ 1 thousand
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
  • Publicidade por placas, estandartes e faixasR$ 1 thousand84.0%
  • Printed materialsR$ 15012.6%
  • Financial charges, bank fees and/or credit card operationsR$ 403.4%
  • 1 other categoryincludes R$ 0 entered as "miscellaneous, to be specified"R$ 0less than 0.1%
2012City councillor, Rio de Janeiro (RJ)See donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 153
no donations from individuals
party and other campaigns 100%
Spending contracted
R$ 153
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
  • Printed materialsR$ 153100.0%
2008City councillor, São João de Meriti (RJ)See donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 1 thousand
donations from individuals
party and other campaigns 92% · individuals 8%
Spending contracted
R$ 1 thousand
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
  • 1 other categoryR$ 1 thousand100.0%

Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. 2026: partial amounts, according to the TSE data of 14/10/2026; 2024: TSE data of 14/09/2026; 2022: TSE data of 13/09/2026; 2020: TSE data of 12/09/2026; 2018: TSE data of 13/09/2026. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.

See donors, suppliers and spending ›

Candidacies

12 candidacies

This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.

G é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.

A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.

The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.