Já tem conta? Entrar
Paulo Feijó (Paulo Fernando Feijó Torres) ran in 8 elections between 1994 and 2014, for federal deputy and mayor, according to data from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). He was elected 4 times: federal deputy in 2014, 2010, 2002 and 1998. The highest vote was in 2002, for federal deputy for RJ: 110,935 votes. In the Chamber of Deputies, had R$ 55.4 million committed in 40 individual amendments to the 2016 to 2019 budgets, to 32 municipalities; 88% has already been paid, counting carried-over payables. In the 2014 campaign for federal deputy for RJ, reported R$ 230 thousand in income: R$ 8 thousand de outros recursos do partido, R$ 172 thousand from private donations (38 donors), R$ 10 thousand from companies and R$ 39 thousand from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 230 thousand, mainly on advertising with printed materials (R$ 69 thousand), third-party services (R$ 53 thousand) and activists and street mobilization (R$ 34 thousand). In previous campaigns, already closed, reported contracted spending of R$ 103 thousand in 2010 and R$ 22 thousand in 2008.
See donors, suppliers and detailed spending of the campaign ›
The votes of Paulo Fernando Feijó Torres in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.
The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.
Paulo Feijó reported income and spending to the TSE in 3 campaigns: mayor in Campos (RJ) in 2008, and federal deputy for Rio de Janeiro in 2010 and 2014. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. In the most recent campaign, in 2014, reported R$ 230 thousand in income: R$ 8 thousand de outros recursos do partido, R$ 172 thousand from private donations (38 donors), R$ 10 thousand from companies and R$ 39 thousand from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 230 thousand, mainly on advertising with printed materials (R$ 69 thousand) and third-party services (R$ 53 thousand). In 2010, R$ 103 thousand in committed spending; in 2008, 54% of the R$ 22 thousand in committed spending went to production of radio, television or video programs.
Fundraising, where the money came from:
Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.
In the Chamber of Deputies, Paulo Feijó had R$ 55.4 million committed (amount pledged by the government) in 40 individual amendments to the 2016 to 2019 budgets (legislative term 2015 a 2018), to 32 municipalities. R$ 48.8 million (88%) has already been paid, counting carried-over payables. The area that received the most was Saúde (51%). The cities that received the most were Campos dos Goytacazes, São Francisco de Itabapoana and Santa Maria Madalena.2
| Budget | Committed | Paid | % paid | Amendments | Municipalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | R$ 15.4 million | R$ 11.7 million | 76% | 8 | 2 |
| 2018 | R$ 14.7 million | R$ 13 million | 88% | 10 | 28 |
| 2017 | R$ 12.5 million | R$ 11.3 million | 90% | 16 | 4 |
| 2016 | R$ 12.5 million | R$ 12.5 million | 100% | 5 | 3 |
| Total | R$ 55.2 million | R$ 48.5 million | 88% | 39 | 32 |
Areas that received the most
Municipalities that received the most
Source: Transparency Portal (CGU), organized by Radar do Voto, collected at the source in Oct 2026. Only individual amendments, including special transfers (the "Pix amendments"); the amount is the committed amount, and paid includes carried-over payables. Caucus, committee and rapporteur amendments, which do not have a single author, are in the dashboard.
See all amendments in the Amendments Radar ›
Disclaimer. Information for reference only, organized by Radar do Voto from public data. It does not replace checking the original source: the Transparency Portal (CGU) and the Chamber of Deputies website. Radar do Voto is not responsible for decisions made based only on this information. ↩
Analysis generated with AI. The summary and analysis texts in this section were generated with the help of artificial intelligence from these data and may contain inaccuracies. When in doubt, the numbers from the original source prevail. ↩
May be out of date. Committed and paid amounts change during the year, and this section may not reflect the most recent publication from the source. Data updated on 10/14/2026, collected at the source in Oct 2026. ↩
This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.
Federal Deputy · 2014ELECTED48,058GRJ · 58 years · White · Higher education, complete · Deputado · PR · no. 2288 · see full result
Federal Deputy · 2010ELECTED · REMAINDER22,619GRJ · 54 years · Higher education, complete · Engenheiro · PR · no. 2288 · see full resultcampaign finance reportChamber of DeputiesG é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.
A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.
The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.
