Search

Francisco Floriano

Photo of Francisco Floriano de Sousa Silva
Francisco Floriano
Francisco Floriano de Sousa Silva (legal name)
7 elections between 2004 and 2026 · latest party MDB
67 years old in 2026 · Male · Higher education, incomplete
Publicitário
Candidate for State Deputy · Rio de Janeiro · 2026 elections · MDB · no. 15800
Renúncia situação do registro nos dados do TSE de 18/10/2026
social media reported to the TSE

In the 2026 election for state deputy for Rio de Janeiro, Francisco Floriano (MDB) got 67 votes at the ballot box, annulled according to data from the TSE (registration status: withdrawn). These votes are not counted among the valid votes. Francisco Floriano (Francisco Floriano de Sousa Silva) ran in 7 elections between 2004 and 2026, for state deputy, federal deputy and city councillor. He was elected 2 times: federal deputy in 2014 and 2010. The highest vote was in 2010, for federal deputy for RJ: 57,018 votes. In the Chamber of Deputies, had R$ 53.9 million committed in 13 individual amendments to the 2016 to 2019 budgets, to 10 municipalities; 96% has already been paid, counting carried-over payables. In the 2022 campaign for federal deputy for RJ, reported R$ 775 thousand in income, from the Electoral Fund (FEFC). Contracted spending totals R$ 784 thousand, mainly on activists and street mobilization (R$ 438 thousand), advertising with printed materials (R$ 261 thousand) and vehicle lending or rental (R$ 17 thousand). In previous campaigns, already closed, reported contracted spending of R$ 789 thousand in 2018 (40% on activists and street mobilization) and R$ 207 thousand in 2014.

4 sectionsTap a section title to open or collapse it.

Vote trend across elections

67 votes in 2026 (annulled) · 7 elections

The votes of Francisco Floriano de Sousa Silva in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.

City CouncillorFederal Dep.State Dep.

The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. "Annulled votes" = votes cast in the voting machines that, according to the TSE data, do not count among the valid votes (the registration status is in the list below). From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.

Campaign funding

2022: R$ 775 thousand in income · R$ 784 thousand em gastos

Francisco Floriano reported income and spending to the TSE in 5 campaigns: city councillor in Rio de Janeiro (RJ) in 2008, and federal deputy for Rio de Janeiro in 2010, 2014, 2018 and 2022. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. In the most recent campaign, in 2022, reported R$ 775 thousand in income, from the Electoral Fund (FEFC). Contracted spending totals R$ 784 thousand, mainly on activists and street mobilization (R$ 438 thousand) and advertising with printed materials (R$ 261 thousand). In 2018, 40% of the R$ 789 thousand in committed spending went to activists and street mobilization; in 2014, 51% of the R$ 207 thousand in committed spending went to advertising with printed materials.

Spending in 2022R$ 784 thousandcampaign closed; all paid
Campaigns6from 2008 to 2026

Fundraising, where the money came from:

  • Electoral Fund (FEFC)
  • Party Fund
  • Other resources from the party and other campaigns
  • Donations from individuals (includes crowdfunding)
  • Companies (until 2014)
  • Own funds
2026partialState deputy, Rio de JaneiroSee donors and spending ›
Raised
no income reported
Spending contracted
no spending reported in the TSE data
2022Federal deputy, Rio de JaneiroSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 775 thousand
no donations from individuals
FEFC 100%
Spending contracted
R$ 784 thousand
all paid (100%)
  • Activists and street mobilizationR$ 438 thousand55.9%
  • Printed materialsR$ 261 thousand33.3%
  • Vehicle lending or rentalR$ 17 thousand2.2%
  • Accounting servicesR$ 16 thousand2.0%
  • 3 other categoriesincludes R$ 36 thousand entered as "miscellaneous, to be specified"R$ 52 thousand6.6%
2018Federal deputy, Rio de JaneiroSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 779 thousand
3 individual donors
FEFC 76% · Party Fund 14% · party and other campaigns less than 1% · individuals 4% · own funds 6%
Spending contracted
R$ 789 thousand
paid: R$ 779 thousand (99%)
  • Activists and street mobilizationR$ 319 thousand40.4%
  • Printed materialsR$ 171 thousand21.6%
  • Creation and inclusion of web pagesR$ 120 thousand15.2%
  • Content boostingR$ 80 thousand10.1%
  • 5 other categoriesincludes R$ 27 thousand donated to other candidates and partiesR$ 100 thousand12.6%
See the 3 previous campaigns
2014Federal deputy, Rio de JaneiroSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 207 thousand
44 individual donors
individuals 20% · companies 76% · own funds 4%
Spending contracted
R$ 207 thousand
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
  • Printed materialsR$ 106 thousand51.4%
  • Publicidade por placas, estandartes e faixasR$ 38 thousand18.2%
  • StaffR$ 32 thousand15.4%
  • Mail and postageR$ 30 thousand14.4%
  • 2 other categoriesR$ 1 thousand0.6%
2010Federal deputy, Rio de JaneiroSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 60 thousand
29 individual donors
party and other campaigns 4% · individuals 66% · companies 27% · own funds 3%
Spending contracted
R$ 60 thousand
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
  • Publicidade por placas, estandartes e faixasR$ 14 thousand23.5%
  • Printed materialsR$ 8 thousand12.6%
  • Third-party servicesR$ 4 thousand6.6%
  • TelephoneR$ 2 thousand3.5%
  • 6 other categoriesR$ 32 thousand53.9%
2008City councillor, Rio de Janeiro (RJ)See donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 7 thousand
no donations from individuals
own funds 100%
Spending contracted
R$ 7 thousand
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
  • Printed materialsR$ 4 thousand48.8%
  • StaffR$ 4 thousand48.8%
  • Transportation or travelR$ 1712.4%

Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. 2026: partial amounts, according to the TSE data of 14/10/2026; 2022: TSE data of 13/09/2026; 2018: TSE data of 13/09/2026. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.

See donors, suppliers and spending ›

Legislative amendments

R$ 53.9 million committed · 96% paid · 13 amendments in 10 municipalities

Chamber of Deputies. For information only, based on public data1 · summary and analysis generated with AI2 · data updated on 10/14/20263

In the Chamber of Deputies, Francisco Floriano had R$ 53.9 million committed (amount pledged by the government) in 13 individual amendments to the 2016 to 2019 budgets (legislative term 2015 a 2018), to 10 municipalities. R$ 51.8 million (96%) has already been paid, counting carried-over payables. The area that received the most was Saúde (93%). The cities that received the most were Tanguá, Itaboraí and Rio das Flores.2

CommittedR$ 53.9 million2016 to 2019 budgets
PaidR$ 51.8 million96% of the committed amount, with carried-over payables
Amendments13individual
Municipalities10different
By budget year
BudgetCommittedPaid% paidAmendmentsMunicipalities
2019R$ 15.4 millionR$ 15.4 million100%40
2018R$ 14.8 millionR$ 14.3 million97%20
2017R$ 12.5 millionR$ 12.5 million100%10
2016R$ 11.2 millionR$ 9.6 million86%610
TotalR$ 53.9 millionR$ 51.8 million96%1310

Areas that received the most

  1. 1SaúdeR$ 49.8 million92.6%
  2. 2UrbanismoR$ 2 million3.6%
  3. 3EducaçãoR$ 1 million1.9%

Municipalities that received the most

  1. 1TanguáR$ 2.7 million4.9%
  2. 2ItaboraíR$ 2 million3.7%
  3. 3Rio das FloresR$ 737 thousand1.4%

Source: Transparency Portal (CGU), organized by Radar do Voto, collected at the source in Oct 2026. Only individual amendments, including special transfers (the "Pix amendments"); the amount is the committed amount, and paid includes carried-over payables. Caucus, committee and rapporteur amendments, which do not have a single author, are in the dashboard.

See all amendments in the Amendments Radar ›

  1. 1

    Disclaimer. Information for reference only, organized by Radar do Voto from public data. It does not replace checking the original source: the Transparency Portal (CGU) and the Chamber of Deputies website. Radar do Voto is not responsible for decisions made based only on this information. ↩

  2. 2

    Analysis generated with AI. The summary and analysis texts in this section were generated with the help of artificial intelligence from these data and may contain inaccuracies. When in doubt, the numbers from the original source prevail. ↩

  3. 3

    May be out of date. Committed and paid amounts change during the year, and this section may not reflect the most recent publication from the source. Data updated on 10/14/2026, collected at the source in Oct 2026. ↩

Candidacies

7 candidacies · elected in 2010 and 2014

This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.

G é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.

A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.

The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.