Raised
R$ 459
no donations from individuals
own funds 100%
Spending contracted
R$ 459
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
- Printed materialsR$ 45498.9%
- Financial charges, bank fees and/or credit card operationsR$ 51.1%
Já tem conta? Entrar
Tia Bárbara (Bárbara Daniela Jacques Rodrigues) ran in 3 elections between 2012 and 2016, for city councillor and federal deputy, according to data from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). Not listed as elected in any of them in the TSE results. The highest vote was in 2014, for federal deputy for RJ: 63 votes. In the 2016 campaign for city councillor in São João de Meriti/RJ, reported R$ 459 in income, from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 459, mainly on advertising with printed materials (R$ 454) and financial charges, bank fees and/or credit card operations (R$ 5). In previous campaigns, already closed, reported contracted spending of R$ 1 thousand in 2014 (98% on third-party services) and R$ 784 in 2012.
See donors, suppliers and detailed spending of the campaign ›
The votes of Bárbara Daniela Jacques Rodrigues in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.
The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.
Tia Bárbara reported income and spending to the TSE in 3 campaigns: city councillor in São João de Meriti (RJ) in 2012 and 2016, and federal deputy for Rio de Janeiro in 2014. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. In the most recent campaign, in 2016, reported R$ 459 in income, from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 459, mainly on advertising with printed materials (R$ 454) and financial charges, bank fees and/or credit card operations (R$ 5). In 2014, 98% of the R$ 1 thousand in committed spending went to third-party services; in 2012, 100% of the R$ 784 in committed spending went to publicidade por placas, estandartes e faixas.
Fundraising, where the money came from:
Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.
This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.
City Councillor · 2016ALTERNATE13LSão João de Meriti, Rio de Janeiro · 45 years · White · Secondary education, complete · Aposentado (exceto Servidor Público) · PMDB · no. 15000 · see full result
Federal Deputy · 2014ALTERNATE63GRJ · 43 years · White · Secondary education, complete · Servidor Público Civil Aposentado · PMN · no. 3300 · see full result
City Councillor · 2012ALTERNATE56LSão João de Meriti, Rio de Janeiro · 41 years · Secondary education, complete · Professor de Ensino Fundamental · PMN · no. 33000 · see full resultG é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.
A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.
The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.