Já tem conta? Entrar
Heroilma (Heroilma Soares Lins) ran in 4 elections between 2006 and 2020, for mayor, state deputy and federal deputy, according to data from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). She was elected 1 time: state deputy in 2010. The highest vote was in 2010, for state deputy for SP: 80,819 votes. In the 2020 campaign for mayor in Itaquaquecetuba/SP, reported R$ 404 thousand in income: R$ 250 thousand from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 110 thousand from the Party Fund, R$ 18 thousand from private donations (11 donors) and R$ 26 thousand from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 385 thousand, mainly on staff (R$ 83 thousand), advertising with printed materials (R$ 63 thousand) and legal services (R$ 55 thousand). In previous campaigns, already closed, reported contracted spending of R$ 826 thousand in 2010 (41% on staff) and R$ 2 thousand in 2006.
See donors, suppliers and detailed spending of the campaign ›
The votes of Heroilma Soares Lins in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.
The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.
Heroilma reported income and spending to the TSE in 3 campaigns: federal deputy for São Paulo in 2006, state deputy for São Paulo in 2010, and mayor in Itaquaquecetuba (SP) in 2020. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. In the most recent campaign, in 2020, reported R$ 404 thousand in income: R$ 250 thousand from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 110 thousand from the Party Fund, R$ 18 thousand from private donations (11 donors) and R$ 26 thousand from own funds. Contracted spending totals R$ 385 thousand, mainly on staff (R$ 83 thousand) and advertising with printed materials (R$ 63 thousand). In 2010, 41% of the R$ 826 thousand in committed spending went to staff; in 2006, R$ 2 thousand in committed spending.
Fundraising, where the money came from:
Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. 2020: TSE data of 12/09/2026. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.
This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.
Mayor · 2020NOT ELECTED19,023LItaquaquecetuba, São Paulo · 61 years · White · Higher education, complete · Aposentado (exceto Servidor Público) · AVANTE · no. 70 · see full result
State Deputy · 2014—GSP · 55 years · Pardo (mixed race) · Higher education, complete · Deputado · PTB · no. 14533 · status was listed as ineligible in the TSE data · see the electioncampaign finance report
State Deputy · 2010ELECTED · REMAINDER80,819GSP · 51 years · Higher education, complete · Pedagogo · PTB · no. 14222 · see full resultcampaign finance reportG é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.
A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.
The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.
