- Activists and street mobilizationR$ 130 thousand33.7%
- Third-party servicesR$ 124 thousand32.2%
- Printed materialsR$ 59 thousand15.3%
- Content boostingR$ 30 thousand7.8%
- 5 other categoriesR$ 42 thousand10.9%
Já tem conta? Entrar
Professor Cleiton (PV) became an alternate for state deputy for Minas Gerais in 2026, with 45,349 votes, according to the final results from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). Professor Cleiton (Cleiton de Oliveira) ran in 3 elections between 2018 and 2026, for state deputy. He was elected 2 times: state deputy in 2022 and 2018. The highest vote was in 2022, for state deputy for MG: 47,184 votes. In the 2026 campaign for state deputy for MG, reported R$ 487 thousand in income: R$ 100 thousand from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 200 thousand de outros recursos do partido and R$ 187 thousand from private donations (7 donors). Contracted spending totals R$ 384 thousand, mainly on activists and street mobilization (R$ 130 thousand), third-party services (R$ 124 thousand) and advertising with printed materials (R$ 59 thousand). Partial amounts, according to the TSE data of 14/10/2026: the campaign finance report for this election is still in progress. In previous campaigns, already closed, reported contracted spending of R$ 664 thousand in 2022 and R$ 139 thousand in 2018.
See donors, suppliers and detailed spending of the campaign ›
The votes of Cleiton de Oliveira in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.
The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.
Professor Cleiton reported income and spending to the TSE in 3 campaigns: state deputy for Minas Gerais in 2018, 2022 and 2026. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. In the most recent campaign, in 2026, reported R$ 487 thousand in income: R$ 100 thousand from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 200 thousand de outros recursos do partido and R$ 187 thousand from private donations (7 donors). Contracted spending totals R$ 384 thousand, mainly on activists and street mobilization (R$ 130 thousand) and third-party services (R$ 124 thousand); R$ 91 thousand has already been paid. In 2022, R$ 664 thousand in committed spending; in 2018, R$ 139 thousand in spending. 2026 amounts are partial, according to the TSE data of 14/10/2026.
Fundraising, where the money came from:
Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. 2026: partial amounts, according to the TSE data of 14/10/2026; 2022: TSE data of 13/09/2026; 2018: TSE data of 13/09/2026. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.
This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.
G é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.
A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.
The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.