Já tem conta? Entrar
Celinho Sintrocel (PCDOB) became an alternate for state deputy for Minas Gerais in 2026, with 45,988 votes, according to the final results from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). Celinho Sintrocel (José Célio de Alvarenga) ran in 10 elections between 2004 and 2026, for state deputy, mayor and city councillor. He was elected 4 times: state deputy in 2022, 2018, 2014 and 2010. The highest vote was in 2026, for state deputy for MG: 45,988 votes. In the Legislative Assembly of Minas Gerais, directed R$ 80.2 million in 244 state amendments to the 2023 to 2026 budgets, to 83 municipalities; 66% of this amount has already been paid. In the 2026 campaign for state deputy for MG, reported R$ 606 thousand in income: R$ 265 thousand from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 67 thousand de outros recursos do partido e de outras campanhas and R$ 274 thousand from private donations (27 donors). Contracted spending totals R$ 593 thousand, mainly on staff (R$ 254 thousand), advertising with printed materials (R$ 149 thousand) and vehicle lending or rental (R$ 36 thousand). Partial amounts, according to the TSE data of 14/10/2026: the campaign finance report for this election is still in progress. In previous campaigns, already closed, spent R$ 789 thousand in 2022 (69% on activists and street mobilization) and R$ 274 thousand in 2018.
See donors, suppliers and detailed spending of the campaign ›
The votes of José Célio de Alvarenga in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.
The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.
Celinho Sintrocel reported income and spending to the TSE in 9 campaigns: state deputy for Minas Gerais in 2006, 2010, 2014, 2018, 2022 and 2026, and mayor in Coronel Fabriciano (MG) in 2008, 2012 and 2016. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. In the most recent campaign, in 2026, reported R$ 606 thousand in income: R$ 265 thousand from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 67 thousand de outros recursos do partido e de outras campanhas and R$ 274 thousand from private donations (27 donors). Contracted spending totals R$ 593 thousand, mainly on staff (R$ 254 thousand) and advertising with printed materials (R$ 149 thousand); R$ 345 thousand has already been paid. In 2022, 69% of the R$ 789 thousand in spending went to activists and street mobilization; in 2018, 44% of the R$ 274 thousand in spending went to activists and street mobilization. 2026 amounts are partial, according to the TSE data of 14/10/2026.
Fundraising, where the money came from:
Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. 2026: partial amounts, according to the TSE data of 14/10/2026; 2022: TSE data of 13/09/2026; 2018: TSE data of 13/09/2026. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.
In the Legislative Assembly of Minas Gerais, Celinho Sintrocel directed R$ 80.2 million in 244 state amendments to the 2023 to 2026 budgets, to 83 municipalities. As of the data collection at the source, 66% of this amount had been paid. The agency that received the most in the 2023 a 2026 legislative term was Fundo Estadual de Saúde (46%). The cities that received the most in the 2023 a 2026 legislative term were Pingo-d'Água, Antônio Dias and Governador Valadares. By legislative term: in the 2023 a 2026 legislative term, R$ 73.8 million in 223 amendments; in the 2019 a 2022 legislative term, R$ 6.4 million in 21 amendments.2
| Budget | Sponsored | Paid | % paid | Amendments | Municipalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | R$ 26.5 million | R$ 0 | 0% | 72 | 51 |
| 2025 | R$ 24 million | R$ 23.6 million | 99% | 94 | 52 |
| 2024 | R$ 17.8 million | R$ 17.8 million | 100% | 38 | 24 |
| 2023 | R$ 5.4 million | R$ 5.4 million | 100% | 19 | 13 |
| Legislative term 2023 a 2026 | R$ 73.8 million | R$ 46.9 million | 64% | 223 | 81 |
Agencies that received the most (2023 a 2026)
Municipalities that received the most (2023 a 2026)
Source: Assembleia Legislativa de MG — Portal da Transparência (Indicações de Emendas Parlamentares 2023-2026), organized by Radar do Voto. The total leaves out blocked amendments and caucus, committee and rapporteur amendments, which do not have a single author. "Paid" is the current stage of each amendment at the source.
See all amendments in the Amendments Radar ›
Disclaimer. Information for reference only, organized by Radar do Voto from public data. It does not replace checking the original source: the transparency portal of the Minas Gerais state government and the Legislative Assembly of Minas Gerais. Radar do Voto is not responsible for decisions made based only on this information. ↩
Analysis generated with AI. The summary and analysis texts in this section were generated with the help of artificial intelligence from these data and may contain inaccuracies. When in doubt, the numbers from the original source prevail. ↩
May be out of date. Committed and paid amounts change during the year, and this section may not reflect the most recent publication from the source. ↩
About the state data. Each state publishes legislative amendments in its own format, with different levels of detail and publication deadlines. That is why there may be amendments without an identified municipality, amounts reallocated to another purpose and payments that only appear at the source some time later. The state figures in this profile are an approximation: before any formal use, check the transparency portal of the Minas Gerais state government and the Legislative Assembly of Minas Gerais. ↩
This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.
State Deputy · 2026ALTERNATE45,988GMG · 66 years · White · Secondary education, complete · Auxiliar de Escritório e Assemelhados · PCDOB · no. 65112 · see full resultcampaign finance report
State Deputy · 2022ELECTED · REMAINDER44,262GMG · 62 years · Pardo (mixed race) · Secondary education, complete · Deputado · PC do B · no. 65112 · see full result
State Deputy · 2018ELECTED35,840GMG · 58 years · White · Secondary education, complete · Deputado · PC do B · no. 65112 · see full resultcampaign finance report
Mayor · 2016NOT ELECTED12,840LCoronel Fabriciano, Minas Gerais · 56 years · White · Secondary education, complete · Deputado · PC do B · no. 65 · see full result
State Deputy · 2014ELECTED36,344GMG · 54 years · White · Secondary education, complete · Deputado · PC do B · no. 65112 · see full resultcampaign finance report
Mayor · 2012NOT ELECTED27,234LCoronel Fabriciano, Minas Gerais · 52 years · Secondary education, complete · Deputado · PC do B · no. 65 · see full result
State Deputy · 2010ELECTED45,373GMG · 50 years · Secondary education, complete · Auxiliar de Escritório e Assemelhados · PC do B · no. 65112 · see full resultcampaign finance reportG é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.
A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.
The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.
