Raised
R$ 956
3 individual donors
Party Fund 3% · party 26% · individuals 71%
Spending contracted
R$ 956
the TSE does not publish the amount paid for this year
- Third-party servicesR$ 65068.0%
- Printed materialsR$ 27628.9%
- Property rentalR$ 303.1%
Já tem conta? Entrar
Zezinho do Sindicato (José Aparecido de Lima) ran in 8 elections between 1996 and 2016, for city councillor and federal deputy, according to data from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). Not listed as elected in any of them in the TSE results. The highest vote was in 2006, for federal deputy for SP: 2,449 votes. In the 2016 campaign for city councillor in Ribeirão Branco/SP, reported R$ 956 in income: R$ 29 from the Party Fund, R$ 247 de outros recursos do partido and R$ 680 from private donations (3 donors). Contracted spending totals R$ 956, mainly on third-party services (R$ 650), advertising with printed materials (R$ 276) and property rental (R$ 30). In previous campaigns, already closed, reported contracted spending of R$ 461 in 2012 (65% on advertising with printed materials) and R$ 120 in 2008.
See donors, suppliers and detailed spending of the campaign ›
The votes of José Aparecido de Lima in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.
The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.
Zezinho do Sindicato reported income and spending to the TSE in 4 campaigns: federal deputy for São Paulo in 2006, and city councillor in Ribeirão Branco (SP) in 2008, 2012 and 2016. The amounts are those of the time of each campaign, not adjusted for inflation. In the most recent campaign, in 2016, reported R$ 956 in income: R$ 29 from the Party Fund, R$ 247 de outros recursos do partido and R$ 680 from private donations (3 donors). Contracted spending totals R$ 956, mainly on third-party services (R$ 650) and advertising with printed materials (R$ 276). In 2012, 65% of the R$ 461 in committed spending went to advertising with printed materials; in 2008, 42% of the R$ 120 in committed spending went to advertising with printed materials.
Fundraising, where the money came from:
Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.
This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.
City Councillor · 2016ALTERNATE20LRibeirão Branco, São Paulo · 67 years · White · Primary education, incomplete · Aposentado (exceto Servidor Público) · PMDB · no. 15150 · see full resultcampaign finance report
City Councillor · 2012ALTERNATE23LRibeirão Branco, São Paulo · 63 years · Primary education, incomplete · Agricultor · PMDB · no. 15147 · see full resultG é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.
A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.
The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.