Search

Negalaize

Photo of Leila Regina Lopes
Negalaize
Leila Regina Lopes (legal name)
2 elections between 2006 and 2018 · latest party PT
51 years old in 2018 · Female · Higher education, incomplete

Negalaize (Leila Regina Lopes) ran in 2 elections between 2006 and 2018, for district deputy and federal deputy, according to data from Brazil's Superior Electoral Court (TSE). Not listed as elected in any of them in the TSE results. The highest vote was in 2006, for federal deputy for RS: 438 votes. In the 2018 campaign for district deputy for DF, reported R$ 6 thousand in income: R$ 5 thousand from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 420 de outras campanhas and R$ 250 from private donations (an online crowdfunding campaign). Contracted spending totals R$ 5 thousand, mainly on third-party services (R$ 3 thousand), staff (R$ 2 thousand) and food (R$ 480).

3 sectionsTap a section title to open or collapse it.

Vote trend across elections

106 votes in 2018 · 2 elections

The votes of Leila Regina Lopes in each election they ran in, from oldest to most recent. All on the same scale (the highest vote recorded); the color shows the office.

Federal Dep.District Dep.

The longest bar (the one that goes all the way) is the highest vote recorded for any office, elected or not; it works as a ruler, and all the other bars are proportional to it (the longer the bar, the more votes). What shows whether the person was elected is the fill, not the length: filled (colored) bar = elected; only the dashed outline = not elected; "to the runoff" = went to the runoff. From oldest (top) to newest. Click a bar to see the result of that election. The campaign finance report of each candidacy is in the list below.

Campaign funding

2018: R$ 6 thousand in income · R$ 5 thousand em gastos

Negalaize reported income and spending to the TSE in 1 campaign: district deputy for Distrito Federal in 2018. In the most recent campaign, in 2018, reported R$ 6 thousand in income: R$ 5 thousand from the Electoral Fund (FEFC), R$ 420 de outras campanhas and R$ 250 from private donations (an online crowdfunding campaign). Contracted spending totals R$ 5 thousand, mainly on third-party services (R$ 3 thousand) and staff (R$ 2 thousand).

Income in 2018R$ 6 thousandcampaign closed
Spending in 2018R$ 5 thousandcampaign closed; all paid
Campaigns12018

Fundraising, where the money came from:

  • Electoral Fund (FEFC)
  • Other resources from the party and other campaigns
  • Donations from individuals (includes crowdfunding)
2018District deputy, Distrito FederalSee donors and spending ›
Raised
R$ 6 thousand
donations from individuals and an online crowdfunding campaign
FEFC 88% · party and other campaigns 7% · individuals 4%
Spending contracted
R$ 5 thousand
all paid (100%)
  • Third-party servicesR$ 3 thousand57.1%
  • StaffR$ 2 thousand32.1%
  • FoodR$ 4809.1%
  • Mail and postageR$ 440.8%
  • 2 other categoriesR$ 400.8%

Source: campaign finance reports filed with the TSE (open data). Radar do Voto has these data from 2006 on in general elections and from 2008 on in municipal elections; earlier campaigns do not appear. 2018: TSE data of 13/09/2026. Contracted spending is the total of the expenses the campaign reported; paid is the part already settled (the TSE only publishes the paid amount from 2018 on). The spending categories are the TSE's; the detail by supplier is in the dashboard. Corporate donations have been prohibited since 2015.

See donors, suppliers and spending ›

Candidacies

2 candidacies

This person's history at the polls, from the most recent candidacy to the oldest.

G é Eleição Geral: presidente, governador, senador e deputados. L é Eleição Local (municipal): prefeito e vereador. De 1933 a 1990 o TSE não publica cargo municipal, então esses anos são todos G.

A candidacy without votes is a registration that did not reach the ballot: according to the TSE data, a registration not approved, a withdrawal, or a running mate, who does not receive individual votes.

The race or color is the one the person declared to the TSE in the registration of each candidacy. The Court started collecting this information in 2014; that is why it does not appear in earlier candidacies.